I own them all.

PS3:

The good- great games, best graphics, awesome games in the future, blu ray, free online, sony.

The bad- not much variety for now...

360:

The good- A lot of shooters

The bad- kinda weak console that heats a lot, have to pay for online.

Wii:

The good- Innovative, fun to use for a while. Good childhood memories (Zelda, mario, etc)

The bad- Very bad graphics, crappy online, too much crappy third party games.

I've had much more fun with my DS. But I'd say the DS is for quick, pick up and put down fun.

I've had some fun times with my PSP too, though, not all titles are great, the ones that are good, are pretty awesome.

The average 360 game requires 100k - 5 mb.

PS3 games are starting to require 1-5 gb installs.

Is it just me, or is blu-ray not as big of a leap over dvd as Sony claims?

-GhostMLD-

if you fight with blu ray, you fight with the future of movies :P you phail :P

[QUOTE="potterpipi"]

Not me, and I actually think people that go to the arcade are pretty stupid. They should just buy a PS3 or 360 for graphics, and a Wii if they're into those motion sensing games.

As for DDR, well, guess it's the only thing one would go to the arcade. (even though I don't play that)

IDateWhiteChick

dang, that's pretty harsh. not all of us are shut-in hermits, and some of us actually like to leave the house for once. That was the good thing about old school arcades- they were somewhat social.

Don't get me wrong. I only play 1 hour of my ps3 daily, if I play it. Barely in my house :P

Not me, and I actually think people that go to the arcade are pretty stupid. They should just buy a PS3 or 360 for graphics, and a Wii if they're into those motion sensing games.

As for DDR, well, guess it's the only thing one would go to the arcade. (even though I don't play that)