@returnofthebrotha: I believe you are right. But then again, if you follow Digital Foundry videos, they show that 1080 120 fps on high settings is doable on Gtx 1660 ti. Once you add up 4k ultra preset, fps goes down to 60 fps on Gtx 2080 ti (bruteforce gpu). Given that Ultra preset is not the target and consoles go for medium range, solid 60 fps is relatively acheivable. Now you add low preset or partial RTX to it, it goes down to 30 fps. I think overall tweak and stuff will do good and perform well on consoles. These examples are based on overall average conception of different games. Some games are more taxing definitely.

@deviltaz35: phones are more applicable things. There are millions more who buy phones and wont play games. Yeah its way too weired to fight on 100 dollars more or less when the consoles will work so many years. But then again, phone users are way more than gamers.

@MondasM: i think 1440 p 60fps will be the lowest. I think devs gonna go for two options on games, like 1440 p 60 - 120 fps or 4k 60. Depends on games though.

@deviltaz35: dude, 30 percent more gpu goes to render 2160 or higher than 1440 p rendering which has more tax on hardware, but when you compare pro goes for 1440 with more stable fps cuz higher res on xbox x has tolls on fps.

@returnofthebrotha: depends on the games. AAA games will be 4k 60 or even less. Online competitive games can go 4k60 or 1440 120 or even 1080 144.

I remember this game. I was 13 when i played it.

This one is a masterpiece.

@livedreamplay: Ps5 will be 499$. Right now Navi sells for 400$, a year from now it will be 300$, AMD gonna spice it a little bit andand make it 20 percent faster, Alas raytraced 500$ console. Its clear as a day.

@drnknnmd: Haha, nice. But hey, sometimes you need artistic games, dont you? I mean its not always packing and carrying, it will be beautiful too. It seems to be.

@hrv_25: Honest.