PC_Rocks' forum posts

Avatar image for pc_rocks
PC_Rocks

8469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#1  Edited By PC_Rocks
Member since 2018 • 8469 Posts

It's a sh*t port but LOL using IGN for a technical analysis by I'm assuming the failed clown cow known as NXGamer!

Just goes to show you how professional reviewers are garbage giving it almost perfect scores across the board. Happened with DS, any Rockstar sh*t, CP2077 etc.

Avatar image for pc_rocks
PC_Rocks

8469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#2 PC_Rocks
Member since 2018 • 8469 Posts

@mrbojangles25 said:

Because Valve is a company that's literally run by employees and not by an executive dictating what should be done. It works like a co-operative and in some ways even better than a co-operative even though Gabe owns it but he doesn't run it.

I recently met a person who worked at Valve and seriously I was dumbfounded when I heard how the company functions. It was almost like something from a fantasy utopia, employees themselves decide what project to work on, who and when to hire and who gets how much bonus etc.

Yeah, Valve is simply incredible. It is not overstating the fact to say they are arguably one of the greatest companies involved with video games (and definitely one of the best involved with PC gaming) ever.

I heard they're actually pretty tough, though. Like if you work there, you have to propose a project, and you have to produce an end result (whether it's a success or failure doesn't matter so much I've heard). Did your friend touch on that aspect at all? Not saying good or bad, just saying that they apparently have pretty high standards.

The virtues of being successful and not publicly traded!

Haters in 3...2...1....

No, we didn't discuss anything like that. The topic came up when we were discussing layoffs in general and how your average Joe has no power whatsoever. I mean you might be true about that but I don't know how would that work if no manager looking over you?

I did know about a similar thing though but with Google. In Google maintaining a service or keeping it up doesn't count or take you far. You have to propose and come up with a new product in order to climb the ranks. That's why the company at one time has 4 messaging apps competing with each other. Make a new product/idea, work on it regardless of any real value or feasibility, climb the corporate ladder, when the project inevitably fails blame someone else or something else,rinse and repeat.

Avatar image for pc_rocks
PC_Rocks

8469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#3 PC_Rocks
Member since 2018 • 8469 Posts

I was always told by cows that PC gamers bash Sony games because they are jealous. Told them nobody cares about Sony's one and done games propped up just by production values. It's a different market that values gameplay/mechanics over long cut-scenes or Press X to win.

Avatar image for pc_rocks
PC_Rocks

8469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Avatar image for pc_rocks
PC_Rocks

8469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#5 PC_Rocks
Member since 2018 • 8469 Posts

@R4gn4r0k said:

I love how Valve has contiuously kept improving Steam over the last couple of years. From handheld support to this.

Many big companies can't even begin to measure to what Valve is doing with a relatively small amount of employees.

Because Valve is a company that's literally run by employees and not by an executive dictating what should be done. It works like a co-operative and in some ways even better than a co-operative even though Gabe owns it but he doesn't run it.

I recently met a person who worked at Valve and seriously I was dumbfounded when I heard how the company functions. It was almost like something from a fantasy utopia, employees themselves decide what project to work on, who and when to hire and who gets how much bonus etc.

Avatar image for pc_rocks
PC_Rocks

8469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#6 PC_Rocks
Member since 2018 • 8469 Posts

I don't see what's the difference between mid gen refresh or next-gen anymore. Devs have only now stopped supporting last gen so what difference does it make? They can easily market it as next-gen or mid gen. Nothing really will change, gone are the days of substantial jumps in performance so at this point in time it's basically whatever the marketing department will come up with.

Avatar image for pc_rocks
PC_Rocks

8469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#7 PC_Rocks
Member since 2018 • 8469 Posts

@Willy105 said:

@TheEroica: It's nothing new, the game has been widely interpreted as racist since the first trailer. Most people gave it a chance until it came out though, but when it came out and people played the game, it turns out that yeah...it was pretty racist. Although most people joked around about how you were a western white guy with a light-skinned black woman who teamed up to kill zombies that all conveniently were only black people, in actually the black people in the game were portrayed using common racial stereotypes, even showing black people as savage before they turned into zombies.

When making the game, the Japanese developer drew inspiration from European descriptions of the African continent...as opposed to getting inspiration directly from the African continent itself. Which is a mistake for sure.

It's not impossible to remake RE5 without it being racist; but racists are not going to like the changes that would need to be made to make it not racist, most likely.

Thanks for the explanation. I always assumed it's more nuanced than the hurr durr, the zombies will be black because you're in Africa. I can totally see why it can be offensive to some people especially who encounter it regularly in daily lives.

I played it when it came out and I my self didn't see it as racist but it's a while back and I also don't remember much apart from the bulky protagonist Chris and hot Sheva. Was also a teenager back then so wasn't even that knowledgeable.

Avatar image for pc_rocks
PC_Rocks

8469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#8 PC_Rocks
Member since 2018 • 8469 Posts

Cool so from 2060/S to 2080ish?

Avatar image for pc_rocks
PC_Rocks

8469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#9 PC_Rocks
Member since 2018 • 8469 Posts

Apart from the live service and sport games:

Halo (Never looked interesting to me)

Final Fantasy (Actually tried 13 for 5 minutes and uninstalled)

Elder Scrolls/Fallout (Tried Skyrim and F4 for an hour minutes and uninstalled them immediately)

Pokemon - Again never see the appeal of it

Persona or most other JRPGs - Have no interest in anime

Any of the older Star War games

Duke Nukem

Avatar image for pc_rocks
PC_Rocks

8469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#10 PC_Rocks
Member since 2018 • 8469 Posts

@mrbojangles25 said:

Ubisoft has been on a role of late, credit where credit is due.

I'm looking forward to this game. A lot.

@pc_rocks said:
@Litchie said:

Don't need to watch, it's Ubisoft.

Repetitive. Derivative. Cinematic. Poo.

This. See the Ubisoft logo and stay the f**k away.

I get it, I want to hate Ubisoft, but their last few releases have been pretty fun.

  • Avatar was a good game
  • AC Mirage had some issues, but ultimately reworked the gameplay mechanics and world design to classic AC standards (abandoning the enjoyable, but generic, action-focused gameplay of the last three games).
  • The Division 2 is arguably one of the best examples of a "games as a service" looter-shooter, and has been supported well.
  • Anno 1800 is an amazing city builder
  • R6 Siege has maintained a solid following and is loved by many.
  • Far Cry 6 was kind of "meh" for me, but it wasn't a bad game. My criticisms are more subjective, I don't think there's anything really wrong with it though.
  • Hell, they even still support the criminally underappreciated For Honor, almost a decade after it has been released and the playerbase has waned.

Honestly the only stinker in recent memory has been Skull and Bones, and who didn't see that coming?

Out of all the games you listed Anno is the only decent one. Avatar is pretty much a typical Ubisoft open world crap.

AC Mirage is still AC. No need to say anything about AssCreed.

Far Cry 6 was Far Cry - a typical Ubisoft open world garbage.

As for supporting games longer? Well, they do so they can milk the base but that doesn't mean the games or mechanics themselves are good or enjoyable. They literally make chores and not games.