@oi_oi_spanky: no, what you said was "Ok? What about graphics" in response to my post warning not to discuss piracy. That had nothing to do with my post. You then accused me of not reading the OP, phrasing it in a snarky and accusatory manner: "Didn't you bother to read the whole of OP's post? So much of that goes on. You won't be the last I'm afraid.". I then clarified why I was confused, and returned ANOTHER snarky response clearly aimed at picking a fight: "Easily confused then?". And you have now finished off AGAIN with a snarky response, insisting you know my motives better than myself: "Now, me pointing this out is picking a fight? I'd say you preferentially read and get annoyed when it's pointed out to you."
Give it (and me) a break - this is off-topic and disruptive trying to box me into a corner that you incorrectly decided existed in the first place and won't let go.
Well, PSN hasn't been down so it must be you're PlayStation. I may be a bit obtuse here but have you even set up your PlayStation on your router? Or if you're cabled (which I do) have you told the PlayStation that it's cabled? May seem like I'm taking the piss but you just can't plug a cable in the back and expect it to work.
You claimed Jesus' resurrection was historical fact. I said put up or shut up.
You couldn't.
I provided evidence and a source about the state of the debate you half-heartedly denounced said state of the debate while offering no support for your opinion other than your own. That behavior is what should be called self-righteousness.
@hillelslovak said:
Do you truly believe that Jesus Christ, who surrendered himself to die for others based on the concept of a sacrifice for sin, would encourage murder, a sin?
That contention holds no merit.
Not sure that was the intention. Probably more like making the ultimate sacrifice for mankind.
That is what I was saying. I am not sure where the disagreement is.
Come again? Is it customary for everyone to read a reply and take it as an arguement on these forums?
@Treflis: Please, I'm not asking you justify your opinion although some people here seem to read the thread title and skip the post. Now, just one more time I'll put it out there, you think and then you reply please. What if the North Korean government is telling its people the truth and you have had nothing but a pack of lies rammed into you through, shall we say, easily obtainable data? I mean, it's not the North Korean people feeding you this "information" is it? Do you finaly understand?
I do understand but If you're not asking for my opinion and why I view what I do, then what discussion is there in this topic?
Cause clearly me agreeing that the info you can find can be unreliable due to being second hand information by default was not the case, but rather my opinion on wether I believe the information that is being presented or I am being lied to. Clearly now that is also not what you wished for me to answer since my answer to that is I do believe a good amount of the info rather then what the North Korean government is presenting.
Not to mention you asked me in your last post why I had the views that I do, I wasn't supposed to answer/justify why I held the position that I do when you asked me?
^^^
Can anyone please tell me why he is defending his view when I specifically stated that it's not relevent of the topic multiple times? Anyone?
But this is what the discussion is about. Is it really like that? Or are you told to believe that?
So, you finaly understand what the topic is about. What if it's YOUR government telling YOU lies?
And again, who are you trusting to bring you this information? Have you met these people? Why are you trusting these people whos face you have never seen?
You asked me questions, I answered.
If you didn't want me to answer the questions you gave me then you should've either not asked me the questions or told me not to answer them if they were retorical.
Log in to comment