nVidiaGaMer's forum posts

Avatar image for nVidiaGaMer
nVidiaGaMer

7793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

203

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 nVidiaGaMer
Member since 2006 • 7793 Posts

[QUOTE="tutt3r"]

dang they both look bad geez this is 2009 ppl compare new games that look good, those are soooooo yesterdays news and look ugly now lol

themerlin

Haa man there is some good looking last gen games and to say that MGS4 and Gears 2 are ugly ,ughhh what is this i can`t even .........

Yeah Gears 2 is still the best looking game on the 360.

Avatar image for nVidiaGaMer
nVidiaGaMer

7793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

203

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 nVidiaGaMer
Member since 2006 • 7793 Posts

Go with Forza 3 ... Gran Turismo games are notorious for there delays.

Avatar image for nVidiaGaMer
nVidiaGaMer

7793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

203

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 nVidiaGaMer
Member since 2006 • 7793 Posts

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"] Yeah I was thinking the exact same thing lol.. Those have to be bullshots, MGS4 looked good when I played it.. But it was never that sharp.sSubZerOo

Must be your tv then because mine looked even sharper then that screenshot.

Lol what ever you say buddy.

Theres a big difference between a Vizio and a Samsung.

Avatar image for nVidiaGaMer
nVidiaGaMer

7793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

203

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 nVidiaGaMer
Member since 2006 • 7793 Posts

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

Bullshots? If anything the games look better in motion then from those screens. In a way those screenshots don't do either games justice to how good they look.

sSubZerOo

Both games have 16x AA yes? Because I see no jaggies in either picture.

Yeah I was thinking the exact same thing lol.. Those have to be bullshots, MGS4 looked good when I played it.. But it was never that sharp.

Must be your tv then because mine looked even sharper then that screenshot.

Avatar image for nVidiaGaMer
nVidiaGaMer

7793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

203

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 nVidiaGaMer
Member since 2006 • 7793 Posts

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

[QUOTE="mo0ksi"]It doesn't look that much better than the console versions. Really Codemasters, this was what the delay was for?GTR2addict

I agree. Gran Turismo 5 and Forza 3 still compare to this game and there running on DX9 hardware. :lol:

...with little damage, paper-cut crowds, zero water effects, crap dirt, jaggies all over the damn place, low resolution upscaling... yeah, compare :|

Those 3D crowds in Dirt 2 look like Gran Turismo 4s and thats on PS2.

Avatar image for nVidiaGaMer
nVidiaGaMer

7793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

203

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 nVidiaGaMer
Member since 2006 • 7793 Posts

It doesn't look that much better than the console versions. Really Codemasters, this was what the delay was for?mo0ksi

I agree. Gran Turismo 5 and Forza 3 still compare to this game and there running on DX9 hardware. :lol:

Avatar image for nVidiaGaMer
nVidiaGaMer

7793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

203

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 nVidiaGaMer
Member since 2006 • 7793 Posts

Unfortunately, I'm wyrd not to believe you :P

MetroidPrimePwn

And why is that?

Avatar image for nVidiaGaMer
nVidiaGaMer

7793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

203

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#10 nVidiaGaMer
Member since 2006 • 7793 Posts

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

And of MGS4

topgunmv

Bullshots? If anything the games look better in motion then from those screens. In a way those screenshots don't do either games justice to how good they look.

Both games have 16x AA yes? Because I see no jaggies in either picture.

Theres little or no jaggies unless your looking at fences for example. :roll: