Nintendo always has some weird gimmicky looking point to each console, but it turns out great and very nice. The screens on the controllers sound like they could be very interesting and fun for some games, but not others. If you add a screen to the mote's IT NEEDS TO BE CHEAP, or cheaper than $60 for a remote ATLEAST, otherwise it's not worth having the screens.

People like online and multi-player because it has endless posibilities, CPU has a limited capability and you eventually get tired of it.

@BhavanS The way 3D normally works in a theater is by sending half the pixels to each eye, the glasses only "separate" the pixels so that each eye see's the pixels it needs to. With a small screen the glasses aren't necessary because the screen separates the pixels for you.

Price is fine. If you want a lot, you pay a lot.

I have always noticed the AI in games and have always wanted them to be as good as humans themselves(although it would never replace online).

Isn't that good, every game seems to "contain" the controls in the middle of the screen? The pointer is dumb, you don't point you move it across the screen? Costs a LOT for both controllers just to play a game you can "walk" on. Bad remote design, can't be turned sideways for racing games or used as a normal controller when needed. Sorry, the camera is good but is very poorly designed.