That's about what I gave it as well. The game was an incoherent mess.

The question I have is this: When does a publication decide to review a game so bad? I mean, if you look at the shovel-ware available on the Wii, PC -- every format really, why single out a single game? If it were released by a major publisher, like Take2 and Duke, then I see the point. But otherwise it seems capricious and bully-like.

If you are going to give a low score, at least make it an enjoyable reading exercise. This reads like a high-school newsletter.

"Worse yet, every mind-numbingly awful innuendo and facsimile of human emotion is further injured by some of the most horrific voice acting imaginable."

Short review. I would think that if you are going to bother to review a game on the lowest level a bit more depth could have been given.

"Tess is a badger let loose from a cage. To cross her path is to sign your own death warrant."

Okay, thanks Mickey Spillane. Did the dame also have gams that went forever?