greaseman1985's comments

Avatar image for greaseman1985
greaseman1985

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

@spartanx169x: Over time that became true, as there have been countless reboots and "what ifs" and crossovers or whatever. Some characters were incorporated into Marvel after buying other companies and properties. Also some characters may have been created later and debuted within an already established franchise, I understand that. But, when you look at these different stories such as X-Men, Spiderman, Iron Man, Doctor Strange, etc, their worlds and the laws that govern them look too different from each other. X-men is about mutants, Doctor Strange is about magic, Iron Man is about a rich playboy and technology. These worlds are too different from each other to claim that they were designed from the beginning to be in a shared universe.

Avatar image for greaseman1985
greaseman1985

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

Its a little early for April Fools.....

Avatar image for greaseman1985
greaseman1985

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

@Bread_or_Decide: "respawning is similar to sending reinforcements"........

Avatar image for greaseman1985
greaseman1985

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

@jerusaelem: What do you mean "they're not, and have never been"? Are you saying all these characters and settings created by many different people throughout the last century, were somehow always meant to be in one large shared universe? If you're talking about the movies, you're still incorrect, as X-Men was owned by Fox and was separate, Marvel/Disney did their own sh** with MCU, and Spiderman is owned by Sony....

Avatar image for greaseman1985
greaseman1985

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

@Bread_or_Decide: Yes, it makes sense because respawning is similar to sending reinforcements. However parachuting into battle with zero weapons and fighting 30 other "teams" or whatever makes no sense in the context of this game.

Avatar image for greaseman1985
greaseman1985

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

I'll say this again, this battle royale crap makes absolutely zero sense within a historical shooter setting like this game. This was completely unnecessary but EA had to get into this fad, I guess.

Avatar image for greaseman1985
greaseman1985

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

Those who enjoy these games also enjoy being subs in a BDSM relationship and have a mistress step on their nuts.

Avatar image for greaseman1985
greaseman1985

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

This MCU thing is crap, each movie/franchise should've been separate and its own thing. Removing these characters with varying strengths and powers from their original distinct comic book settings to mash them all up just doesn't work for me and kills what makes them unique. I know this is not just an MCU thing and it has happened in the comic books as well, but I prefer for example Spiderman to be just about him and his setting, X-Men about them and their setting, Doctor Strange about him and his setting, etc. Each of their worlds are unique.

Avatar image for greaseman1985
greaseman1985

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

This battle royale crap makes zero sense within the world of historical shooters like Battlefield V. But hey, I guess everyone wants a piece of the new fad.

Avatar image for greaseman1985
greaseman1985

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

@lionheartssj1: I don't want X-Men in the MCU, and I don't want Disney's grubby hands on everything.