Renslayer did not even have the stage presence and story to match Kang, never mind a villain like Thanos. Let it fizzle and bring Doom so they can screw that one up, too.
@stickemup: Let's talk about it. What is the need? Nintendo doesn't need to make stuff look as good as what the green or blue guys make. I have the opinion that games are at a point in advancement that graphical fidelity becomes a choice rather than a necessity. Not every painting needs to be a Michelangelo or Rembrandt. Let's also embrace the Picasso's and Van Gogh's, while the big boy's drop large stacks on tiny incremental gains in real-time polygonal realism.
"You pay homage to the people that came before" That is what they should have with Star Wars. Let that be the lesson to whoever is remaking MGS3. If you make it for everyone, no one will like it. If you make for the fans that loves the original, everyone will like like it.
I don't like how the Ring does not bring with it any detrimental effects. Gollum was a shell of his former self after being tempted by the ring so many times. Bilbo became reclusive and snappy. Frodo lost his will at the end. Nevermind Borimir, Isildur, and even Gandalf was almost tempted by the ring, but he foresaw the negative effects and rejected it outright, as did Aragorn. The abilities brought on by the Ring in MtG should have some kind of negative effect to reflect the effects it had in the stories.
@Ice-Cube: It was a commentary/satire on the poor choice of title. The title literally promises to explain HOW to play the game and it does not. It only explains what is in the game and when you can play it.
I suspect the title was chosen to get more clicks or the writer was just being lazy. Maybe both.
gaiden81's comments