Made me laugh :P So fictional baptism is against his beliefs, but he has nothing against killing hundreds of people, showering the screen with their blood. This is so ironic on so many levels

What a douchebag.

@queuing_for_PS4 Croatia ^^

Loved the interview, thank you! More stuff like this please :)

Much needed article. People need to cool their heads and start seeing the issue for the complex conundrum that it is. Well said: stand strong against censorship, but self-reflect.

Haha... I wonder who the representatives will be.

Great article, thank you :) It's very interesting to find out more about the writer.

And I am supposed to be excited about this... why exactly?

@mayatola I agree :D I understand his fundamental point, but he is fighting windmills.

@mayatola But it's still just semantics. Tom defines fun differently than Greg, and that's where the problems arise. What you describe as fun is by Toms definition = engaging. And yeah, I agree, every game has to be engaging. But sometimes, in fact often, art (even games in which your progress is more measurable, palpable and is a direct consequence of your actions) will be immensely engaging and enjoyable without being fun (in a sense). That enjoyment will come from a feeling you lived through something hard and awful, but managed to get your grip, get trhough it and win. And again, semantics: you could say this is actually - fun.