After installing Ubuntu on my tiny laptop, I found out FTL: Faster Than Light runs on Linux. So I am playing that.

So seemingly, insofar as he is called a critic, and carries his function of being as such, he must be energised, variegated and ultimately validated in this variety of media by a conventionally regarded to be boring or only barely callous, only barely self-relaxing (mountain-dewing), passive group of would-be-gamers.

Although suppositionally valid, this remark MAY be considered to be slightly unhelpful with respect to our present subject. Noticing a slight reluctance to leave well-worn I-some identity mistakes of passive, deflecting or ironical position-taking by more or less journalistic but ostentatious beings, even thread-bombers or anti-readers; despite nevertheless being sufficiently open and amply serious commentators, you evidently or of course, at least, superficially do not have the patience to redeem your inclinations or your argumentative, demonstratively rhetorical or eloquent strategies or whatever essence intended that would seemingly involve the enlivening of our discussions with your subjective opinions in some attentively picaresque or brusque way, or something.. I BELIEVE, insofar as possible, whether by institution of quality or lack of quality, qualification or disqualification, by what is conventionally regarded AS being qualitatively or quantitatively relevant, as being critical or detrimental in any way to whatever situation, gaming or otherwise, on-line or in daily life, mainstream or catering only to a marginal group, a critic stands at liberty to be in his own way a subjective observant, especially where it cannot be avoided, as well as being an artist of criticism, where it can aid his clarity and commercial or technological significance. Frankly, even considering the above responses, this should probably still not be regarded as a very analytical process, most of the above responses for some reason immediately concerning matters of personage, tagging, label, i.e., matters of Google, whereas otherwise slightly more rational responses are also immediately more positive with regard to our critic's creative content, irrespective of his socio-commercial persona, that his web-based profile seemingly projects. Like in Larkins quote, written in an honest, informed approach, with clearly the aid of a truly synthetically historical sense, please immediately discern a clearly collective concern immediately transcending Chillocks more forgivably banal, perhaps in some ways fortunately yet regrettably provincial, that is to say, polite, or politically rustic, considerations.

As far as my considerations can go and are able to estimate, this quote says something sensible about making choices and understanding these matters of style, boredom and entertainment - in any event, that might be kind of more of where we should try to want to be headed in our rumination from now on. But the question is still open.

Gaming is still somewhat lazier than reviewing games, if you ask me, no reason not to be interested in these youtube guys, these monologuers-on-games; you know, when you think about it, gaming takes up more attention and gives you less for it in return because you're labouring your free-time away, too; these guys are not merely about entertainment anyway, might even be the case that, if you're attentive here, you might learn something or even rid yourself of some weird stuff; no reason to complain about it at least, I mean, at least it's stuff.

Are these complaints guys? That's growing up in ANY age. Don't know why it has to be associated with anything like this

Truly, really wondering why. I've always watched a lot of reviews. Never liked our reviewers that much. Our gaming reviewer should be little more than a gamer turned labourer, the labourer is more than a gamer of course; so when they become labourers AND get bored at games, like the way we are conventionally regarded as having a boring job, or the jobs boringness providing a meaningful way of making wasting time valuable, that's when it gets awesome. That's when you get a good critic, like Mr. Plinkett, reviewing our Star Wars geekily and critically, i.e., self-deprecatingly soporifically superficially and unapologetically like a useless bum, like a time-waster AND a professional working-man. And then, like, even though being a reviewer can be boring too, then still, as he yet manages to transform himself, away from this thing, he becomes relevant in an indirect way. - I ask you, Claim your opinions, Friends, forgive me, or not, I am not worried: there's nothing necessarily wrong with exerting myself for your sake.

Anyway, gotta post this somewhere, might as well be here - maybe it should be elsewhere... but listen, and I am certain about people being patient with off-topic postage, like, getting to the point a little later than usually instead of immediately, and admit it, it's just out of boredom that you're reading something on the internet, why else would you visit this forum, I guess, if it wasn't to read something on a forum anyway, it has gotta be boredom, because it's never essentially about anything truly mattering inside daily life-time, its past-time.

Trying to get to the point right now. Biscuit. Trying to do something, not really or especially, in an indirect way, and then together with it from the outset - it's possible. It has value to, and he's popular, maybe, and he must've had a clear idea of criticism in his mind before he started, to make the investment to become an 'ideal critic': for he seems to be really inspired and motivated, in the sense of people reading him and agreeing with him and getting inspiration from others, it is kind of motivating (he's probably also making money, in a good way, of apparently in a sense getting validation by being considered valuable) - this figure as, in the sense, you know, like where he's going with all this talk of providing the consumer with the right kind of critical service and all that; it's remarkable how he said, in an early postal he was already reflecting on the essence of his public function - a hallmark of his proficiency - how he thought the gaming industry needed better 'media'; well, one could really agree and at the same time think that he's giving people 'good' media, yet wonder how far can he go talking about everything like a weird kind of erudite without providing 'gaming' as such with a true soul. This is what I continue to miss. Gaming is still dumb, for some reason, even in the most erudite, comparative, reflexive critic imaginable. Still, its interesting to watch it anyway.

@GamerNerdTalk: Probably this is not really a problem, keep your eyes open and just try to focus on playing something seriously good: most of the gamers who used to be on those good old server-worlds you used to visit are still around, kicking in it new games. Right? What more do you want.

Tried the formatting software. Did a full format, but it didn't help. The new micro SD (2gb, I'm afraid) does work though, so it was the fault of the SD. Whether it was because it was HC or Trancend I don't know. Thanks for the help, everyone.

Not really ment to be talking about that here as it files under flash card. "Any discussion about Flash Cards/Homebrew/Emulators can result in a moderation with a suspension duration and the possibility of a permanent ban".

Mitazaki

O no! Is it inevitable, I mean, if they read this tread?