Except for maybe RE5, I don't see any noticeable difference, only the color scheme seems slightly different (the contrast seems to be slightly higher on the PS3 while the 360's colors are noticeably brighter). This isn't really a proper showcase of the PS3's technical strength anyways since exclusives, the PS3's killer feature, are excluded. The 360 is still a great console and seems to be easier to develop games for. But anyway stop arguing now, both are great consoles, period.

I always knew this day was going to come. But if, as promised, this OnLive thing does actually blow away its hardware competition (360, PS3, and primarily PC gaming), I will be happy since the focus will shift towards software (games). So it won't be about who has the "best system" anymore, but about who has the "best games", and that's what all gamers want. But personally I think that OnLive came too quick too suddenly; I have 2 next-gen gaming systems right now (360 and Wii) and I wouldn't want them to be obsolete anytime soon; I feel even worse for all those PC gamers out there with thousand-dollar rigs. But I do hope that OnLive works out as expected - it is healthy for the industry creatively and is the future of gaming. But there will probably be some sort of fee on it; if it is anywhere near what I currently pay for Xbox Live Gold, I'm fully down for it. As for naysayers, I currently have an unlimited bandwidth 5Mbps Dry DSL connection here in Toronto, Canada, and pay 40 bucks a month for it - usually I get results in the neighborhood of 4.2M down/ 650K up and latency between 50-100ms. And there are even better and more reputable independent providers out there - do some searching and stop supporting these monopolist major companies. As for security, this gaming thing is sure as hell nowhere near as risky as online shopping, which we all do - so please shut up. Besides, hacker protection is probably a big priority in cloud computing, so they paid attention to it.