@d-man @dbb00kw0rm Nowhere in my post did I state that this review was erratic. I stated that her reviewing style is erratic. Read this review, then a number of her other reviews, both highly-rated and low-rated. She's not consistent at all.

Her voice is unrelated to her review skills, and I did not say it affects her ability to review games. Just that it's not a voice that is pleasant for video reviews. As I stated in my original post, my voice is the same way, and this is why I never make narrated videos. Accusing me for judging her reviews based on her voice is completely different from what I actually presented in my original post.

Your last paragraph shows why you're really answering this. You saw that I mentioned the issue that seems to crop up every time Carolyn posts something and accuse me of basing my arguments on it- which is completely wrong, and fallacious as well. You're setting up a straw man fallacy and attacking me for that- when it's far from what I actually argue. Nowhere in my original post, other than that last sentence, do I make any reference to her sexuality or how that might affect her ability to write reviews.

As for your last line... you don't even know what you're talking about. This discussion has nothing to do with morality. But it's obvious that your parents should have taught you some basic logic and reading comprehension when you were a toddler. QQ (Gee, how does that faulty logic feel when it's thrown back in your face?)

So... I started out neutral on Carolyn.

But the more reviews from her I read, the less her reviews make sense. She's very erratic, and she'll rate some games highly for certain reasons but then rate other games lower for the same reason. I see some of her reviews and they make sense, then I see a few others and they are completely weird. So yeah. I don't really like her as a reviewer now.

Not to mention she really doesn't have a voice chat is tailored to video reviews. It's not very pleasant to listen to, and it makes me skip video reviews just because I don't want to hear her voice. I don't have a pleasant voice either, so I never do narration or stuff because I just don't have a voice for that. Carolyn should do the same.

I honestly don't care about her sexuality or whatever, so don't make accusations about that. This comment is purely based on her writing/speaking talent.

@PinchySkree They shouldn't be, though. Sequels should be rated as how good they are in and of themselves.

I'd buy it in a heartbeat if it was on PC (and if they didn't ruin the game on launch like some other developers I could name...)

@Aravos They never said LCU is better than GTAV. They said it does some things better than GTAV does. And they are right.

You should accidentally corrupt your comment so no one else has to be subjected to your mistake.

From Erick's comments, it almost seems like the reason the console gets better drops is because it's harder to play the game on a console and you need the look to compensate for that. He stated it gave him loot "when he was struggling", while he said that on the PC "It felt easy, even though [he] didn't have that many rares."

Therefore, from this experiment, it seems the real takeaway is that the PC has better controls or balancing or something while the consoles have better loot to make up for it.

@Naswari Some people don't have consoles and can't afford to buy a console. Personally, I bought it for PC when it first came out and while I never got a legendary, I had plenty of rares drop.

@gohan661 It's also coming out on the PC.

Is it bad that I'm more excited about character customization than anything else they've revealed so far?

@SlawekAB Yep, it does.