The only guy i can't trust with a review is Mark, becuase he's such an "action game" fanboy. But even when Kevin gives a low score to a game i like i can trust him becuase he's always truthful about the bad stuff.
@sethfrost All reviews are subjective, they will always contain the personal taste of the reviewer. Otherwise it would be a description, not a review. But yes, reviews should contain useful information like the ones you mention besides the personal opinion/taste of the reviewer. But don't expect anything else than personal taste from Mark Walton's reviews.
@likanlicious @crix01 @lucaslla @fredyellowone Not at all. A review is subjective and a test is objective. Obviously he's going to answer correctly his own test.
@Lynx_7 It doesn't matter if it's my game of choice or not. And you're doing the same of what your acussing me of. "I don't have the same opinion as you? I must be a hater". Pretty typical for GS commenters.
"Essential" is also a vague concept.
"Essential" is some arbitrary thing they tag to the score in an effort to set themselves apart from other sites. But those other sites also gave the game a 10 and they don't mean "essential". In truth all those 10 mean the same thing and is not that "essential" bs.
crix01's comments