When updating an article, at least correctly check each entry please. So many of these entries are released now and Chris Avellone was cleared of wrongdoing after his accusers retracted their statements:
Ubisoft has lost over 72% of its stock value over the past five years and their games are flop after flop, now their leadership says stuff like this. I'm very comfortable not owning more Ubisoft games that's for sure.
How is gg deals being called Green Man Gaming in the article? The quality of editorial review has been going down on Gamespot for years now but now from regular typos it is down to factual errors that could lead to lawsuits (GMG could sue you) by directly linking to websites offering the ability to buy gray market games. Please get your act together Gamespot, I don't want to see this site fail like so many others already have.
These lists are clearly made to promote recent games and cause outrage for engagement, waste of time looking at the rankings although discovering some unknown games can be fun. Still, dishonest ranking is not a very nice thing to do.
Sorry but this has to be said: This list is extremely poorly reasoned, quality shows are buried, strange woke arguments are used instead of facts and reasoned positions to justify rankings and several excellent shows are dismissed for no good reason. This list should be avoided by anyone looking for a thoughtful interpretation of these shows and their quality.
The article is generally fine but the very first sentence is missing a word "one of the ... successful". Please proof-read better before publishing GameSpot, seeing more of these issues lately. I certainly hope AI-writing and checking aren't being used, they lower quality.
This poorly reasoned, generally nonsensical list (with at least one instance of copy-paste left intact at time of publishing) is an affront to Star Wars and Gamespot's readership as a whole. There were a few points here and there I could agree with but please never make more of these if this is what is going to reach some poor reader's brain. Someone might actually take this list seriously and think poorly of gems such as the recent Star Wars animation, missing out on some of the best content.
The article could make that clearer instead of going for a vague "aspects" where most people will think it's the engine (Apex uses Source). Thanks for making the services side of the Unity company visible.
chronocommander's comments