chitosan87's comments

Avatar image for chitosan87
chitosan87

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Its weakness were covered by its stunning Graphics.

But remember nowadays's Entertainment Formula: Great Graphics doesn't mean Great Content


Avatar image for chitosan87
chitosan87

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

I don't know whether a good or a bad news for this one. But I thought, it's time ... yeah, it is the time for Activision to let go the Bond's game franchise.

I mean, we are in the Gaming Era of PS3 and PC (Sorry Xbox). Mostly Bond's games were dull, boring & predictable. It went out on PS3, but somehow I'm feeling that this is a game for Xbox (w/out 360). Graphics were so-so. Gameplay... None of any significant changes. Story... We are just playing the movie.


Why don't Bethesda or those Japan's companies take the Bond franchise? It'd be strange at first, I bet. But, they produced Games with Quality. :P

Avatar image for chitosan87
chitosan87

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By chitosan87

Geez .. This is why I hate Sega, small improvement. It's PS3 ... Come on ... This fighting system looks like PS2. Few enemies, limited fighting area, simple movement.


Sorry to say, this game is boring ...

Avatar image for chitosan87
chitosan87

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By chitosan87

It does a great Job in crossover. Reminded me of Nintendo era,, where there are no save point. Makes Megaman (Rockman) hard as hell to be played when I was a boy.