chineolee's forum posts

Avatar image for chineolee
chineolee

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 chineolee
Member since 2004 • 637 Posts

@BSC14: Been playing around virtual super resolution in Shadow or Mordor and Alien Isolation on my R9 290x, and it really does improve the clarity of the textures, so yes I agree!

Avatar image for chineolee
chineolee

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By chineolee
Member since 2004 • 637 Posts

Woohoo I'm seeing a one point increase in Unigine Heaven!

The benchmarks Coseniath mentions above show very small improvements, and for some games it's decreased! (e.g. Sniper Elite 3, Shadow of Mordor). Bioshock Infinite sees a decent fps improvement though (in the TweakTown benchmarks).

Given all the fanfare over this driver release, one might have hoped for more significant improvements, but I guess this was all about the new "features".

Avatar image for chineolee
chineolee

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By chineolee
Member since 2004 • 637 Posts

@Rachit1:

Minimum:

OS: Windows Vista (SP2), Windows 7 (SP1) or Windows 8 (Please note that we only support 64 bit OSs.)

Processor: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66Ghz or AMD Phenom II X4 940 @ 3.0Ghz

Memory: 6 GB RAM

Graphics: DirectX 11 graphics card with 1 GB Video RAM - Nvidia Geforce GTX 460 or AMD Radeon HD 5770

DirectX: Version 11

Hard Drive: 25 GB available space

Sound Card: DirectX 9.0c Compatible Sound Card with Latest Drivers

Recommended:

OS: Windows Vista (SP2), Windows 7 (SP1) or Windows 8 (Please note that we only support 64 bit OSs.)

Processor: Eight core - Intel Core i7-3770 @3.5 GHz or AMD FX-8350 X8 @ 4 GHz

Memory: 8 GB RAM

Graphics: DirectX 11 graphics card with 2 GB Video RAM - Nvidia Geforce GTX 560 ti or AMD Radeon HD 7850

DirectX: Version 11

Hard Drive: 25 GB available space

Sound Card: DirectX 9.0c Compatible Sound Card with Latest Drivers

source: http://www.pcgamer.com/2014/04/07/watch-dogs-system-requirements-confirmed-wants-a-64-bit-system-with-significant-oomph/

Avatar image for chineolee
chineolee

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By chineolee
Member since 2004 • 637 Posts

I re-ran the windows experience indexer today and the rating on my primary windows drive (a Kingston V300 SATA 3 240GB SSD) has gone down by 2 points from 7.9 to 5.9. I bought the drive when I built the rig in January this year.

Surprised by this I ran a benchmark on the drive and compared it to my other identical SSD which I bought much more recently and have been using as a secondary applications drive. The results are shown below - first picture is the new drive, second is the 3+ month old drive.

I realise that this isn't entirely scientific - a better comparison would be a benchmark from the same drive taken at the two time points, but I don't have this, and given that the primary drive was rated 7.9 when it was new I tend to assume that its performance at that time was similar to the newer drive's performance today.

I'm aware that enterprise SSD drives apply techniques such as write combining, over provisioning and TRIM to reduce performance degradation, and my Kingston drive may or may not have these features being a relatively cheap variety, however I'm still pretty surprised that performance can apparently degrade so much and so quickly.

This may be nothing new to people, so I apologise if this really is old news, but it surprised me.

I guess my question is, have others experienced this, and is there any way to reverse it?

Avatar image for chineolee
chineolee

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By chineolee
Member since 2004 • 637 Posts

Yes, I concur. Really enjoying this game!

Avatar image for chineolee
chineolee

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 chineolee
Member since 2004 • 637 Posts
I don't think anyone can say for sure. One determining factor will be the success of the Wii2. If it truly refreshes the console market, the next 360 could come sooner.
Avatar image for chineolee
chineolee

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 chineolee
Member since 2004 • 637 Posts
Its the UK hands-down. Apart from English law, parliamentary democracy, industrial revolution, experimental science, discovery of penicillin, we also invented rubber bands (awesome), cork screws, the jet engine, the first man made plastic, Viagra, stainless steel. The list goes on. Oh yeah and the ZX Spectrum http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZX_Spectrum. Case closed.
Avatar image for chineolee
chineolee

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 chineolee
Member since 2004 • 637 Posts
If HD-DVD had been properly supported by the 360 (i.e through an internal drive), maybe the format war would still be on. After all, the PS3 has to take a lot of the credit for the success of blue ray. Its sold 10.5 million units, so thats 10.5 million players already in people's homes. It seems MS were only thinking about their production costs, and obviously weren't concerned about the next gen optical media format war. I guess you could say fair enough, as the 360 is a games machine primarily (and a great one). Still, its a coup for Sony. The PS3 now has the next gen optical drive of choice, and the 360 is stuck with a last gen drive.
Avatar image for chineolee
chineolee

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 chineolee
Member since 2004 • 637 Posts
Call them and see what they say. Guess you got nothing to lose.
Avatar image for chineolee
chineolee

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 chineolee
Member since 2004 • 637 Posts
I doubt it. How would you prove to the MS call centre people that you dont have net access? Anyway, a couple of weeks hardly equates to much money lost.