@guidardo: Indeed, so why not play PC as that's one of the three? Especially when through HIS words he said he'd rather be playing the PC version.
What is it "Oh, I can't do that for-- reasons."
It's not playing on Ps4 that's the issue here, it's the stating wish to play on PC, have it available, and inexplicably not take advantage of that wish.
@shaetheshaman: FPS games are gimped to fuckendum with those peasant sticks.
Peasant sticks, controllers, are only called such when used to deface FPS games. Controllers are fantastic for the RIGHT genres, but they are NOT for FPS.
"As much as I wish I was currently playing Doom on PC"
So why didn't you? It just doesn't make sense if the option is there, and you don't take it. Probably this weird idea of PC somehow not quite being the 'cool' place to be? Or to sate the 'tested on Ps4'?
@asmoddeuss: For PC gamers this confusion won't happen, as of course in that realm '1080p' is not a marketing selling thing like it is in the console space.
Oh, I'm not trying to suggest they were forced to sign up (the Harlem Hellfighters). What I am saying though is it's pretty likely the generals on the field will think "Oh, we've got to send in some troops to take this point, it's gonna be pretty tough on the first wave, with heavy losses. Send in the black guys." They would've fought just like any American (it's also likely some may have fought with the extra vigor to prove they are as worthy as any US soldier, as you suggest), of course, but the reality of that time period is generals would have almost certainly seen them as more expendable then the white soldiers.
As far as Indian soldiers go, it's quite extraordinary to learn over 1 million served for Britain, in East Africa as well as Europe. I was wrong about Cameroon serving for France, they were actually Senegalese-- I hope these guys get a mention in the game as well.
My concern is that they will simply depict history wrongly, and make it appear as though America was more progressive by having black soldiers, but Great Britain and France being apparently less so with only whites. The truth is both America and Europe were just as racist, and maybe America being even more so in some respects.
@Golden_Gonads: Well, Leia was the one bringing the Death Star plans to Alderaan, I'd say that was quite a role. She is clearly the one with the leadership skills. It makes perfect sense that she becomes a general in new films (as in a real general, not the fake generalship Han and Lando were given in Jedi).
Well, all Luke actually did plot crucial in the first film is fly an X-Wing. He wasn't at all good with the force; he made a few adjustments to R2D2 but hardly anything like the proficiency of Rey; he was also entirely useless as a melee fighter, and just average with a blaster-- in fact Leia is better with one.
The agency is shared out between Luke, Leia, Han and also Obi-Wan and the droids.
I just think it would have served the plot better to have Finn be the pilot, even though he isn't good at it, but just make Rey just as bad. The only real weird weakness she has is the inexplicable need to stay on Jakku, which isn't actually explored as a weakness in the film, but rather just some weird fixation which she now and again remembers she has.
It's the power thing I have a problem with, not her as an actual character, as I think she's likeable and well cast.
I haven't heard anyone employ that phrase, and I am from England.
Actually, I think the only time I've seen something similar is on the back of a can of fart gas, you know, that side-splittingly hilarious stuff people used at school (bear in mind this was in the mid 90s). You're right then, in a way, but I still never knew of anyone actually using it in regular speech.
Billzihang's comments