Deftones81 said: "I don't know about you but my 360 uses an HDMI cable....(like the PS3)" And unlike the PS3 your 360 uses version 1.2, which is pretty pathetic and yet another MS scam to you that they fail to mention when they advertise "HDMI". Only PS3 has version 1.3.

The evil aren't the fanboys, it's articles like this which mislead us. It's funny how "professionals" like GS do these graphics comparos, but in reality it's just some guy who may or may not be qualified to get the most out of each system and video set up for a true comparison. Of course, it doesn't matter. This entire article is rubbish and so will these articles for a few years, if not forever. Why? Because all of these games are designed for one system and then ported over to other systems (funny how the writer doesn't mention this as he compares screen shots - most if not all of the games here were made for the 360 and ported over to the PS3). This gives the design console an advantage and the ported consoles a disadvantage. While the devs change the code to port over to other consoles, they never invest the time (and money) to tweak the ported code to full advatnage of the other consoles. And I doubt we'll ever see a multi-platform game that is developed from the ground up to each console's best. Which means graphics comparos are nothing more than a reflection of how good or how lazy a dev is. True graphics comparos will never happen. The closest you can get is exclusive games but since the game is exclusive, it will still never be a true comparo (of the same game). Last but not least: "Now with both consoles well into their respective life cycles"...? Hey, Sarju - do you have any clue as to what "well into...life cycles" mean? The PS3 is certainly nowhere near it. The 360 is close to it. These articles should be banned. Ignorance is bliss.