As someone with something like 173h in the game, i ain't too sure about that😢
I have 57 hours, which is not as much as you, but I think it’s still a good amount of time to have a good grasp on it.
The only "fun" this game had was during the first couple of months when the game was so buggy and glitchy that it was comical, and kinda entertaining to see an AAA release in this state.
Luckily I skipped the game during that early period, I only played the modern recent version.
They should put out an update to New Vegas so that modern gamers can play that game without the hassle of installing mods, but that would mean exposing players to best Fallout game ever made, one that Bethesda didn’t make that makes their games look bad.
Not letting the player see their own stats in a Multi-player shooter..
Was one of the dumbest decisions I've seen a developer make..
I remember reading that the developer said the decision to eliminate stats.. was so that players with bad stats wouldn't be discouraged.. horrible decision.. especially when it's something that has been in every BF game
Bro, its legacy features that don't belong in the 21st century. Wake up.
Lol..
Any studio that comes up with bullshit like that, you know they are in trouble and have shit leadership. Any respectable BF veteran would shut that down right away.
I liked BF alot up until BF1. BF1 was a weird direction for the series. BFV I skipped entirely, had too much weird drama going on around the game. I remember watching some even where the developer was saying "if you don't like the direction of the new BF don't buy it". And I didn't.
Then 2042 came out broken without stats and I knew it was officially over.
I still remince of the days of playing 1942 and BF2 at my local lan center with friends. Playing online in BF3 and 4, It used to be a great series. Always was better than COD back then. It was the good millitary shooter. Now it's a turd.
To be fair, the developer said that in response to actual garbage human beings that wanted them to *remove* features from the game like customization and the single player chapter about real life French freedom fighters…because the player character was a woman. DICE putting out that statement was based.
Played the first one but couldn’t get past the tutorial, it was very uninteresting. But it seemed like a fairly well made game, its a shame the game got associated with losers.
Starfield comes to mind, a 2023 game that looks, feels, and plays like a game released in 2016.
However, the OP is confusing valid and smart game design choices with outdated-ness, because maybe a few games from different unrelated genres today play different.
I hope one day those horrible people at the Florida government can be kicked out. The sheer malice they have been doing for the past decade is cruel and inhumane.
Log in to comment