Wakeboard_Dude's forum posts

  • 23 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for Wakeboard_Dude
Wakeboard_Dude

2549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

15

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 Wakeboard_Dude
Member since 2002 • 2549 Posts

I've been here since 2001, so almost 12 years. But I don't think it was videogames.com when I came, pretty sure it was just gamespot. I came when a google search led me to the system wars forum. 

Avatar image for Wakeboard_Dude
Wakeboard_Dude

2549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

15

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 Wakeboard_Dude
Member since 2002 • 2549 Posts

So? As the title says. Does anyone remember the ZDNet forums? Just how many reiterations have these forums been through anyway?

Avatar image for Wakeboard_Dude
Wakeboard_Dude

2549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

15

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 Wakeboard_Dude
Member since 2002 • 2549 Posts

This is no accomplishment.

Avatar image for Wakeboard_Dude
Wakeboard_Dude

2549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

15

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 Wakeboard_Dude
Member since 2002 • 2549 Posts
this site is soooo strict it just happens..kingdavid562
Yeah, it's pretty bad about that. But there are other forums where people are more real, and yet there's more trolling. Here, people are fake as can be to try to appear good for the mods, but there's less trolling. You've just gotta kinda find a site that can be a good mixture of what you want. And your separate message box idea is horrible imo. It's like having a separate irl mailbox for your bills.
Avatar image for Wakeboard_Dude
Wakeboard_Dude

2549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

15

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 Wakeboard_Dude
Member since 2002 • 2549 Posts

I think a lot of the research out there regarding "video games increasing violent behavior" is just pretty much pointless. I do agree with you though. I'm actually writing a research essay as to how video games can benefit some certain qualities, and one of my counter-arguments dealt with this one study regarding the University of Iowa. It wasn't even a study to me. All they did was a meta-analytic review of already pre-existing scientific journals that had already conducted other studies. Basically they said violent video games are linked to aggressive behavior. There's too many inconsistencies in this one journal, but I'm starting to believe a lot of them are like this.

toxic_jackal

I did a similar essay for university a while back, and many of the journals are similar. There's one researcher, Craig Anderson (google scholar it), who writes a ton of entries on this topic. He also cites his older articles as part of his evidence. On one of his journals he cited himself 7 times for supporting evidence.

Avatar image for Wakeboard_Dude
Wakeboard_Dude

2549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

15

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 Wakeboard_Dude
Member since 2002 • 2549 Posts

(tendencies) Thanks to the topic limit.

I've been researching this topic lately, and if you feel the need for proof check any reliable database and you'll see that the majority of researchers agree that the aggression level is increased when someone plays violent video games. From that they conclude that violent video games encourage violent acts.

These are usually from independent studies or observations where a subjective note is made regarding any noticable increase in aggressiveness.

Now, if one were to check other sources that these researchers are citing, the list is quite surprising. All of the sources are other studies that say the same thing. This is pretty common when trying to prove a point, but something is noticeably absent. The video games themselves are never used as a source. The researchers never seem to explain what about the video game might cause violent tendencies, or even what games were used.

I've come to a conclusion that researchers would have a different opinion on the effects of violence in video games if they took the time to play the games themselves and record their own reactions. It would make for a more interesting study anyhow.


Anyway, what do you think?

Also, if you have 2 minutes or so (maybe less), feel free to take this survey on the subject

http://www.esurveyspro.com/Survey.aspx?id=91dd0642-a995-49f7-87e5-26351c2b4e23

it's just something I'm researching for fun. Take it or don't, I just ask that you finish it, because unfinished ones are still submitted for some reason and it skews everything.

edit: That assumption about most researchers is just from some time spent looking at academic articles on the subject. I know that there are some articles for the other side of the argument, but those were few and far between.

Avatar image for Wakeboard_Dude
Wakeboard_Dude

2549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

15

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 Wakeboard_Dude
Member since 2002 • 2549 Posts
First year at the University of Tennessee Knoxville and am studying electrical engineering.
Avatar image for Wakeboard_Dude
Wakeboard_Dude

2549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

15

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 Wakeboard_Dude
Member since 2002 • 2549 Posts
I don't know actually, it might be, Oblivionfan10
Yeah, it really depends on what "flirting sexually" means. It's not really a crime unless the guy explicitly expresses intent to do illegal things.
Avatar image for Wakeboard_Dude
Wakeboard_Dude

2549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

15

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 Wakeboard_Dude
Member since 2002 • 2549 Posts

[QUOTE="Wakeboard_Dude"]What are you talking about? Turok 2: Seeds of Evil got a 9.0 on GS.Foxtrot561

I'm talking about Turok for the Xbox360, PS3, and PC. It came out in early 2008.

I think you forgot about sarcasm.
Avatar image for Wakeboard_Dude
Wakeboard_Dude

2549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

15

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 Wakeboard_Dude
Member since 2002 • 2549 Posts
What are you talking about? Turok 2: Seeds of Evil got a 9.0 on GS.
  • 23 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3