Hmm...according to the Meyer-Briggs Personality Test, I would go for the INFJ, the counselor. Check the link of the post above, if you're interested. But for the personality traits that I would like to find ina partner, I think these are the best: kind, honest, faithful, loyal, committed, mature (yet have a baby-like side when in private), rational, and last but not least, emotionally stable. Heh. I no longer want any drama in my life. I adore the type of girl who does what she says, and says what she means.
Yeah, I hate the people that think having to walk home without an umbrella while it's raininng is the end of the world. The rain doesn't kill >_>
Desulated
In fact, rain does kill. Once, I had a car with no ABS brake and was driving under a heavy rain. The car in front of me suddenly just stopped and I was about 30-50 feet away. I stepped on the brake and my car just skit and hit that car. Fortunately, no one was hurt, but it would have been worse if it was on a highway.
[QUOTE="atm0073"]I am somewhat on board with you, especially about rainy weather. Whenever it rains, most people I know get all fussy about it, and either require an umbrella to get around or just don't go out at all. I, on the other hand, would be completely complacent with walking a two-mile distance while wearing slippers if it were raining (and I've actually done so). However, I wouldn't say that calling those who dislike the more tumultuous forms of weather "wusses" is the best way to go.Desulated
Yeah, I hate the people that think having to walk home without an umbrella while it's raininng is the end of the world. The rain doesn't kill >_>
In fact, rain does kill. Once, I had a car with no ABS brake and was driving under a heavy rain. The car in front of me suddenly just stopped and I was about 30-50 feet away. I stepped on the brake and my car just skit and hit that car. Fortunately, no one was hurt, but it would have been worse if it was on a highway.
You can't really consider not liking a certain kind of weather is being a "wuss." You would be a wuss to sunshine using your logic. Most people like sunshine because there are a vast variety of activies that they can do outside, such as mowing the lawn, having a pinic/bbq, sports, etc. However, the rain provides nothing for you do outside since most people don't like getting wet. I love jogging/dancing in the rain, though. Yeah, I'm quite a cheesy person.... But to each his own.
[QUOTE="Ultimeaciax"][QUOTE="a55assin"]But over the last few millennia, humans themselves had evolved slightly--as had certain other mammals. Humans were way shorter in the Roman times, way shorter. Our bones differed, our behavior was more aggressive.Tylendal
That's not evolution. That's something called healthy. In the modern world, we have tech/science that helps us understand what's healthy and what's not. Back then they had nothing but just called god for help. We, homo sapiens, have yet evolved. A foot or two in average height doesn't come just from being healthy. There are tons of healthy people under five feet, and plenty of malnourished people over six. Still, in today's modern society, I believe that evolution has mostly stopped, simply because technology gives us a crutch for any weaknesses that natural selection would have formerly weeded out. Show me some that were malnourished throughout their lives and over six. Really. Science has helped to understand our capabilities through eating healthy and such. Back in the Roman times they were shorter, b/c they were a heck more malnourished. Also, a foot or two is a bit over exaggerating... the avg height back then is in the 5'4" range. Today, the avg height for men in America is 5'8" and women is 5'4" (stats taken from Museum of Science in Boston). So, I don't see such a big discrepancy in order to call us that...we have evolved.
Alphabetical letters are used as a metaphor for DNA base pairs within his explanation, not elements.
-Jiggles-
[QUOTE="Ultimeaciax"]
However, we started out w/ a single cell organism... wait no, maybe just an element. We didn't have all 26 possibilities like the alphabets at the start.
-Jiggles-
Alphabetical letters are used as a metaphor for DNA base pairs within his explanation, not elements.
So? I'm just countered his points by stating that we didn't started out with that much possibilities. We derived from a prokaryote. My element thing was kind of irrelevant. I'm just going way too far back, and that's not really "life."
Log in to comment