The_Game21x's forum posts

Avatar image for The_Game21x
#1 Posted by The_Game21x (26362 posts) -

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Umm...duh?

Purely based on what I saw at both conferences, Microsoft's showing destroyed Sony's. The best games at Sony's conference were Watch Dogs, Assassin's Creed 4 and FF XV, all of which are also on the Xbox One.

If Microsoft hadn't s**t the bed with the DRM crap and being $100 more expensive they would have won E3 emphatically.

But they did, so now we're looking at Sony being the victor purely for the things they're not doing.

CWEBB04z

The best games were not Watch Dogs, AC, and Final Fantasy.

Then what was? Killzone? Destiny (which is also on the Xbox One)? Drive Club?

Nothing wowed me at the Sony showing and the indie stuff was merely okay because I have a PC for those.

Avatar image for The_Game21x
#2 Posted by The_Game21x (26362 posts) -

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Umm...duh?

Purely based on what I saw at both conferences, Microsoft's showing destroyed Sony's. The best games at Sony's conference were Watch Dogs, Assassin's Creed 4 and FF XV, all of which are also on the Xbox One. EDIT: And Destiny. That looked incredible but also on Xbox One.

If Microsoft hadn't s**t the bed with the DRM crap and being $100 more expensive they would have won E3 emphatically.

But they did, so now we're looking at Sony being the victor purely for the things they're not doing.

AM-Gamer

Thats absolute BS, the only reason people talk about MS great lineup is because they showed nothing at there reveal. Sony already showed off some games so it was less of a surprise.

How is it BS? What did Sony show off?

Killzone, Infamous, Knack and Drive Club?

Assuming all of those are good (and personally, none of them did it for me, especially since Killzone never has), how is that better than Titanfall, Dead Rising 3, Project Spark, Crimson Dragon, Ryse, Forza Motorsport 5, Halo 5 or whatever the hell Halo game they revealed?

Oh, wait, a couple of those games I mentioned aren't exclusve? So? They're not on the PS4 either.

Avatar image for The_Game21x
#3 Posted by The_Game21x (26362 posts) -

Umm...duh?

Purely based on what I saw at both conferences, Microsoft's showing destroyed Sony's. The best games at Sony's conference were Watch Dogs, Assassin's Creed 4 and FF XV, all of which are also on the Xbox One. EDIT: And Destiny. That looked incredible but also on Xbox One.

If Microsoft hadn't s**t the bed with the DRM crap and being $100 more expensive they would have won E3 emphatically.

But they did, so now we're looking at Sony being the victor purely for the things they're not doing.

Avatar image for The_Game21x
#4 Posted by The_Game21x (26362 posts) -

Knew it was going to happen.

Now Sony fanboys will gleefully jump on the paying for online multiplayer bandwagon after going a whole generation talking about how they're "entitled" to free internet.

I knew this was going to happen years ago. But since I'm not a whiny, entitled flavor of gamer, I don't care. Microsoft killed my chances of getting an Xbox One so I'll just take the money I've been paying for Live and put that towards PS Plus.

My Live account expires in November too. How...fitting.

Avatar image for The_Game21x
#5 Posted by The_Game21x (26362 posts) -

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] You need to provide the evidence, a number is not evidence. Provide the list you're using to claim that. That's supporting your argument 101.kuraimen

I posted my proof. Now prove that my numbers are wrong. Or, you know, keep dodging like you always do, princess. :lol:

When you're ready to "man up" and learn how to actually debate, you know where to find me. :D

Like I said man up and post your list. A number is not a list. When have you seen a number been used as proof without the data to back it up. Then I can just use another number as rebuttal.

Go check Metacritic! The Xbox 360 has over eight and a half pages of games rated at a 70 or higher when you sort them in ascending order. The PS3 has about 7 and a third.

Now go ahead and prove me wrong. For once.

Avatar image for The_Game21x
#6 Posted by The_Game21x (26362 posts) -

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]You said the same thing about the 360 :| In fact I quoted your claim. So man up or shut up.kuraimen

I like how you're the one telling me to man up but you still dodge providing proof. Take your own advice, princess. :D

But fine. WilliamRLBaker posted some counts.

Want to say it's wrong? Prove it. With actual facts. Remember, even if he's off by a couple games, on either side, that's not enough to  account for the 100+ game difference between the two.

You need to provide the evidence, a number is not evidence. Provide the list you're using to claim that. That's supporting your argument 101.

I posted my proof. Now prove that my numbers are wrong. Or, you know, keep dodging like you always do, princess. :lol:

When you're ready to "man up" and learn how to actually debate, you know where to find me. :D

Avatar image for The_Game21x
#7 Posted by The_Game21x (26362 posts) -

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

You're the one who says the PS3 has more games and have yet to prove ANY of your claims.

Debating 101 kid. The burden of proof is on the person who makes the claim, not the one who disputes it. :wink:

kuraimen

You said the same thing about the 360 :| In fact I quoted your claim. So man up or shut up.

I like how you're the one telling me to man up but you still dodge providing proof. Take your own advice, princess. :D

But fine. WilliamRLBaker posted some counts.

Just recounted metacritic entries.

860 70+ games on 360

717 70+ games on ps3

note: both lists contain hd remasters, xbla/psn, and dlc.

WilliamRLBaker

Want to say it's wrong? Prove it. With actual facts. Remember, even if he's off by a couple games, on either side, that's not enough to  account for the 100+ game difference between the two.

Avatar image for The_Game21x
#8 Posted by The_Game21x (26362 posts) -

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] I have proved it in the past. It just takes a lem to post the "list" to start picking the inconsistencies out.kuraimen

Then it should be easy to prove again.

Unless you're talking out of your ass...

You know, like always.

Post your list then.

You're the one who says the PS3 has more games and have yet to prove ANY of your claims.

Debating 101 kid. The burden of proof is on the person who makes the claim, not the one who disputes it. :wink:

Avatar image for The_Game21x
#9 Posted by The_Game21x (26362 posts) -

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] The data has to be interpreted. The only way lems can win is taking decontextualized numbers. The minute they start looking at the games they lose. That's why lems love numbers but not games.Eddie-Vedder

Alright, how about you back up your nonsense and prove that, somehow, the 100+ game difference between 70+ games on the PS3 and 360 is due to your "decontextualized numbers".

It's very easy broski, you list every game available on one platform but not the other. Like I already did. PS3 won by a significant amount, not because of size but beause of everything, it had more games, it had higher scoring games, it had more exclusives, more variety and MUCH more up to date games. The 360's library is ancient for the most part.

Yeah, you keep saying these things but I don't see you actually doing anything.

Avatar image for The_Game21x
#10 Posted by The_Game21x (26362 posts) -

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] The data has to be interpreted. The only way lems can win is taking decontextualized numbers. The minute they start looking at the games they lose. That's why lems love numbers but not games.kuraimen

Alright, how about you back up your nonsense and prove that, somehow, the 100+ game difference between 70+ games on the PS3 and 360 is due to your "decontextualized numbers".

I have proved it in the past. It just takes a lem to post the "list" to start picking the inconsistencies out.

Then it should be easy to prove again.

Unless you're talking out of your ass...

You know, like always.