Yeah! Where the hell is it? It was a great feature!

Gamespot, Please get it back!

Thanks.

Waiting for this from 2004. can't wait.

Official site: www.digitalcombatsimulator.com

The OP thinks that he runs the game on high settings, infact he doesn't.

In order to run CoD4 on High settings you need a SM3.0 capable card and the X850 is only SM2.0b cabable, therefor the game runs on Low/Medium settings (dependson the highest settings that the SM2.0 is supported).

Have you patched it?

@ DrangonfireXZ95: A shooter is not only aboutsingelplayer, its about multiplayer too, Halo 3 has a decent multiplayer in my opinion.

I don't get the hype around Halo 3, its just a normal regular game with weak single player and ordinary multiplayer that is hyped like its the most original and amazingthing ever created, it would never stick up next to a lot of other PC shooters, maybe the 360 just lacks of good shooters that an ordinary shooter like Halo 3 is so hyped? (And no,I didn't say that Halo 3 is a bad game)

And to the topic, CoD4 looks (not only on the graphics side) a lot better in terms of missions and the atmosphere thatcreated on these mission, combined with whats look like a very enjoyable gameplay.

The multiplayer gameplay looks like a typical intense and fluidmultiplayer gameplay which is of course very good altough not revolutionary.

From it looks like right now I'd prefer CoD4.

If SC2 requires SM2.0 Radeon 9500 and above for ATi andGeForce FX (5) and above for nVIDIA.

I hope it would really be SM2.0 and not SM3.0 which a lot of games utilize now,and thus I can't play (my video card supports SM2.0b only).

This game looks very intersting and enjoyable and I really want to play it, I have 3200+ 1GB and X850XT so yes, I'd have to play it on Low settings and I will.