TheOrigin's forum posts

Avatar image for TheOrigin
TheOrigin

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 TheOrigin
Member since 2004 • 2006 Posts
[QUOTE="Tekkenloving"]@ beardtm - so your telling me that the : motion blur, explosions , LIGHTING( most graphically impressive aspect in kz2) that it looks mediocre that's a shocker , the ONLY aspect in gears 2 graphics that is better then kz2 is textures and if we are playing the texture game uncharted get them and any other game beat hands down.beardtm
Killzone 2 looks like a ps2 game with fancy lighting and motion blur. THATS what im saying.

I really hope you don't expect anyone to take you seriously with remarks like this. KZ2 is the best looking console game. Sure, everyone has a different opinion, but more often than not KZ2 has been getting the nod. Gears 1&2 is more on the level of uncharted than KZ2..
Avatar image for TheOrigin
TheOrigin

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 TheOrigin
Member since 2004 • 2006 Posts
so this thread is about the best looking console game not looking as good as you really think it does? Sorry but that's just silly.
Avatar image for TheOrigin
TheOrigin

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 TheOrigin
Member since 2004 • 2006 Posts
It's a shame really. I've had my nintendo since 89 still play it and don't have to worry about it. But with the 360 it seem like once ms has moved on to thier next console I won't be able to play 360 games years down the road because ms didn't pay attention to quality. It's not a very good long term console at all.
Avatar image for TheOrigin
TheOrigin

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 TheOrigin
Member since 2004 • 2006 Posts
I had to go with Far cry 2. Starting brush fires was one of the best parts of game.
Avatar image for TheOrigin
TheOrigin

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 TheOrigin
Member since 2004 • 2006 Posts
The 360 and the PS3 are more like the last place teams fighting to not be last place.
Avatar image for TheOrigin
TheOrigin

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 TheOrigin
Member since 2004 • 2006 Posts
The PS3 and the 360 are already out of the playoffs. There is no way that either of them can win the superbowl.
Avatar image for TheOrigin
TheOrigin

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 TheOrigin
Member since 2004 • 2006 Posts
[QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]

it is a two way street. The PS3 fanboys lower 360 games user score by giving 0s or 1s, while raising PS3 games by giving 10s. The 360 fanboys lower PS3 games by giving 0s and 1s while giivng 360 games 10s. It is the way fanboys roll.

Its absolutely both sides. Having fanboys try to discredit a game is a good sign. It means they are shaking behind thier computers and angry it doesn't fit well with thier agenda. Having fanboys rate a game a 0 is higher praise than the reoccuring 10's
Avatar image for TheOrigin
TheOrigin

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 TheOrigin
Member since 2004 • 2006 Posts
Lol at the damage control that KZ2 is causing. Over at ign the user reviews are at 7.5 and nobody has played the full game. All 10's and 0's. A lot of other sites with user reviews are much lower than the press average. People really wan't to discredit this game. Either way it's a huge victory for sony, they turned an A game into an AAA game that can be added to thier library.
Avatar image for TheOrigin
TheOrigin

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 TheOrigin
Member since 2004 • 2006 Posts

2006 the 360 outsold the ps3. 2007 the ps3 outsold the 360. 2008 the ps3 and the 360 sold about the same. On top of that the 360 also has a lot of multiplats with a few exclusive. I see the PS3 and the 360 having more in common than the sega saturn and the PS3.

Avatar image for TheOrigin
TheOrigin

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 TheOrigin
Member since 2004 • 2006 Posts
It's pretty obvious why we only use Gamespot scores here. First people use what ever reviews they want to validate thier own agenda when there is a single un arguable review on this very site. Aside from that people use game rankings and other sites of that nature that have uneven number of reviews that aren't as consistant because of the multitude of different sources (many of which hold no crediblility). No game gets a fair comparison from different numbers of reviews from different sources If you don't like gamespots review you should go to another site.