TacticaI's forum posts

Avatar image for TacticaI
#1 Posted by TacticaI (1340 posts) -

I've heard good things about it, wouldn't be the first time a fan base sorely disagreed with critics.

@MrGeezer said:

@Mercenary848: Lots of people do, actually. The bigger loss isn't $8, but losing 2 hours of your life watching a piece of ****.

I'm not talking about Venom specifically. I have no idea whether it's good or bad. I'm just saying that plenty of people read reviews. For a lot of people, the time they spend watching movies is FAR more valuable than the $8 they spent on the ticket.

Eh it's still an opinion. Most of the time movies that are critical favorites don't deserve it and some movies are bashed more than they should be. But hey......if you want to have someone tell you what to enjoy then by all means use their opinion rather than your own.

Hyperbole? What critic shit on your favorite movie?

Avatar image for TacticaI
#2 Edited by TacticaI (1340 posts) -

@DragonfireXZ95 said:
@tgob89 said:
@kingtito said:

No says the Sony fan "we don't need options"

You cows are hilarious. Why would you say no to something that is 100% optional? And thus you truly are the clowns of SWs

Says the guy who's prized game collection consists of broken, buggy and unfinished games lol, no thanks brah, we good.

So let's say an unfinished game is available on the store as an early access title; why would that affect you, again?

No. Just because you have a couple of games from Early Access turnout well, that doesn't mean it isn't a terrible business model for us as consumers. We do not need to encourage the losers out there who can't make decent games to get into the business on the whim we will fund their attempts at game development because companies like Microsoft are willing to throw some of their weight behind it, help them market it, and sucker people with good intentions in. You have to be incredibly naive to believe the Early Access model is doing more good than harm, just because you conveniently ignore the vast amount of shit it's produced/going to produce. It's a complete waste of our resources as consumers/gamers. Has anyone tallied up every penny wasted on every crap early access product in existence? Poof, that's a lot of capital up in smoke incentivizing the wrong people to produce useless crap. What a burden for people who just want to play great games to carry and accept on the industry's behalf. Hell no. Let's stick to the tried and true formula of developers earning other people's (if not yours) hard earned dollars. Reading some of these post it's like we learned nothing in the past decade.

Avatar image for TacticaI
#3 Posted by TacticaI (1340 posts) -

X. It's a nice phone that makes even the 7 feel outdated and clunky after spending some time on it. It's like going back to SD from HD, and having to use the home button vs a swipe or FaceID somehow feels less intuitive. I didn't even have expectations going in, I just knew I could upgrade from my 7 without really coming out of pocket or dropping more money on my monthly bill. The resell value on these things have always been good to me.

Avatar image for TacticaI
#4 Posted by TacticaI (1340 posts) -

Lol damn that's bad news. I fell asleep before it really got started. 10 Cloverfield Lane was great.

Avatar image for TacticaI
TacticaI

@Marky360: Yeah the idea of using the browser is ridiculous to me, like why don't I just connect my PC to the television and use its internet browser instead? A console's entertainment features need to be tailored for the big screen, and if MS is going to receive flak for indulging streaming and television networks, the entertainment industry at large, than this should be the one area they receive credit for doing it better than SONY.

For instance, on the One, you power up the box, open the twitch app, voila, everything Twitch has to offer without a hiccup on the big screen. SONY's alternative took you through steps in the complete opposite direction before reaching your destination.

Avatar image for TacticaI
TacticaI

@Mirimon78: It's funny that PS4 users say this or YouTube was fine through the browser, but that doesn't take the responsibility off of SONY for being slow to release and ultimately lacking in their offerings of the apps. That excuse almost makes sense until you use the same apps on the other console and experience how convenient and intuitive the designs work. It's a shame I don't get that from the PS4, but hey, it is what it is.

Avatar image for TacticaI
TacticaI

@kazrium: Right, it couldn't have been a move made in our best interest as customers. The goal this holiday seems for MS to sell as many Ones by any means necessary and get some the momentum shifting back in their direction.

Avatar image for TacticaI
TacticaI

It's about time. As someone who only streams a couple big events and would like to see games before I play them (regardless of console or PC) it seemed downright pathetic how restricting Twitch has been, as far as what you're able to watch, on the PS4.

Avatar image for TacticaI
TacticaI

@kazrium: I think you're taking his words out of context. He only acknowledges that the majority of people play across LIVE (could that be because the majority of games don't support split screen?) in order to say not as many people are going to miss out, though many people would love to have the option, not to suggest he's against people playing together in a living room.

Avatar image for TacticaI
TacticaI

@d_: What constitutes legitimacy? So long as you are underwhelmed by whatever it is, anyone would quickly play the card that it could and should have been there from launch, no?