Stevo_the_gamer's forum posts

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

49566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

407

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#1 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 49566 Posts

Replaced my 2080. Looking forward to breaking it in this weekend.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

49566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

407

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#2 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 49566 Posts

If Sony could actually slim down the machine and not make it look fugly then maybe that in of itself would warrant replacing my existing PS5 which is a total eye sore. A midgen refresh seems unnecessary in this lackluster generation though.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

49566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

407

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#3 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 49566 Posts

@horgen said:
@SUD123456 said:

Fani Willis gets to stay on but gets chastised by the judge for a shocking lack of judgement and inappropriate testimony.

Prosecutor Wade will be removed.

Trial will likely get significantly delayed. Shitshow via a self inflicted wound by Fani Willis.

In what world is it a good idea to sleep with your employee? Way to (literally) fcuk this whole proceeding.

Could be somewhat the culture there. But yeah lack of judgement.

It's cultural to sleep with your coworkers?

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

49566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

407

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#4 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 49566 Posts

@Vaasman said:
@Stevo_the_gamer said:

In the end, it's always the have-nots weeping in envy over those who have.

Compelling stuff.

By the same token I don't see any problems with stabbing people, because only the ones being stabbed are complaining. The guys with the knives seem fine with it.

I mean you do you, comrade. :)

@LJS9502_basic said:

@Stevo_the_gamer: Nothing wrong with expecting taxes to be paid on ALL income. That's not taking from the rich but they've been taking from the rest of America long enough.

I certainly look forward to the taxes owed option when I Venmo someone a few bucks... maybe it's already there! Uh oh.

But true, someone has to pay for all the freeloaders of society.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

49566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

407

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#5 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 49566 Posts

@Vaasman said:
@Stevo_the_gamer said:

Comrade!

Any limit seems rather arbitrary. I mean you and I can work our asses off and yet there's still folks out there making 10s of thousands every month selling used garments and such... the issue of "fairness" doesn't ever truly ring a bell to me.

edit: on second approach, if I could make 10s of thousands selling my used garments... not saying I would, but there would be a consideration.

If the top 1% was able to be taxed out of all the wealth they have in speculative markets, real estate, and other tax dodgy shit, they would be able to provide trillions in revenue instantly without a single change to their current income or lifestyle.

If the bottom 99% was taxed for that same amount there would be mass panic and economic crash, as everyone went into horrible crippling debt and then burn down all the billionaire doomsday mansions.

That doesn't sound like "any limit seems rather arbitrary" to me.

At a certain point it just doesn't matter how wealthy you get, you won't even really notice increasing wealth anymore, and the concept of how much money you actually have falls apart.

Put another way, if you are trying to build a moat of fire around a mansion to keep out the poors, it's not arbitrary anymore, you should be taxed into oblivion.

Ah yes, the whole take from the rich to give to the poor! A classic, comrade! Why only the top 1%? Why not the top 1.23%? Or perhaps the top .123%? Why only unrealized gains? Why not the savings too? In the end, it's always the have-nots weeping in envy over those who have.

But mom it's not fair! Meanwhile, in the two apartments I've hit in a week, I've dealt with 6 adults ranging from 24 to 57 that do not work and spend their days living off the safety nets of the government while their roommate sexually abused children. Six adults. None of them work and each collect their monthly stipends paid for by my fellow comrade jangles and I.

That moat is hilarious. I had a similar conversation with my wife actually, you wouldn't immediately know if I had come into a large sum of money, but there would be signs.

"Hey honey, I parked my new gun in the garage."

"You parked what?"

A moat of fire seems impractical though. First of all, you're lighting a beacon for the region to see... BEACONS ARE LIT. GONDOR CALLS FOR AID.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

49566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

407

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 49566 Posts
@mrbojangles25 said:
@Stevo_the_gamer said:

Where should the limit be set then for how much income one can make?

Should there be a limit for how much a corporation can make?

I don't know, where do you think the limit should be set?

Someone smarter than I am can probably come up with a formula where a CEO get's X % as salary, Y % as stock options, and Z % as bonus (be it performance bonus or a golden parachute), but then there is a hard cap if X+Y+Z exceeds a total % of the companies profit *shrug*

But if you want my simple answer, I'd say...I don't know, how about we cap at $5 million a year? Let's start there.

Before you go defending the rich, let me ask you: do you know what the difference is between $1 million and $1 billion? It's pretty much $1 billion. Let that sink in...especially after you think about just how much you could do with $1 million.

Sincerely,

Comrade Bojangles

PS: EAT THE RICH 😈

😋

Comrade!

Any limit seems rather arbitrary. I mean you and I can work our asses off and yet there's still folks out there making 10s of thousands every month selling used garments and such... the issue of "fairness" doesn't ever truly ring a bell to me.

edit: on second approach, if I could make 10s of thousands selling my used garments... not saying I would, but there would be a consideration.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

49566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

407

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#7 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 49566 Posts

Yes and no.

I bought my home in 2015 and refinanced to a 15 year with a 2.1% rate in 2021. Was able to pay off my wife's student loans and the car when we refinanced. I'll never see a rate like that ever again though, and while it's a starter home, it just doesn't make sense to drop 800k to 1.2m on a nice home in a middle class neighborhood or upper middle class neighborhood. I'm in a cul-de-sac and I like all my neighbors at least, but don't like living within the city limits and would certainly like more property and another bedroom (in case the wifey decides to convince me by ransom to have another kiddo which I'm not sure my liver could handle!). I've also put a ton of blood-sweat-tears into this house will all the remodeling I've done myself, so it's hard to walk away from something you have so much invested into.

In summary, I still like my starter home but like many Californians I'm definitely stuck because of the outrageous housing costs. :(

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

49566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

407

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 49566 Posts

@mrbojangles25 said:

This is why billionaires shouldn't exist. No one should have that much money, wealth, and power. No one should be so enormous in that way they bring others into their orbit, so they say "We can't let _ fail, he is too important". If the most you could have was someone with a few million, you're no longer too big too fail: instead, you're too little to risk one's neck for. You screw up, you're done.

Apologies to all the mega-yacht manufacturers out there, but that's just how I feel🙄

I swear to god, no matter the outcome here, if at the end of this ordeal when the lawsuits are done and in 10-20 years Trump and Biden are dead, if we don't seriously assess the way we use money in our political and legal system, we are a lost cause I am afraid.

I love our political system as a concept and I think it's something worth defending and fighting for but the way it's been used and abused is just disgraceful.

Sorry, not constructive, just needed to vent.

Where should the limit be set then for how much income one can make?

Should there be a limit for how much a corporation can make?

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

49566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

407

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#9 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 49566 Posts

@mrbojangles25 said:

The concept of this is bad enough, but realizing it's true is downright depressing.

Sometimes people really do need to be saved from themselves. Inb4 "but it's their money"

Comrade jangles, it's our money.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

49566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

407

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#10 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 49566 Posts

@LJS9502_basic said:

Making excuses when Republicans break the law. Demonizing everyone else when they do.

Where has that happened in this thread?