StAzKrnchyNMilk's comments

Avatar image for StAzKrnchyNMilk
StAzKrnchyNMilk

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Edited By StAzKrnchyNMilk

@dahaoleboy69 you don't download the games. they run on their computers and it streams a "video" of that image to you, and your input back to the cloud center. all your device has to do is access the "site". @"the rest" I've played a few things on my comp through onlive, and I've never had any trouble with it. I haven't bought anything because like others I want a physical copy of my games, but from the trials I have played I would be willing to make the purchase if there was something PC only that I really wanted on there.

Avatar image for StAzKrnchyNMilk
StAzKrnchyNMilk

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

9

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Edited By StAzKrnchyNMilk

This article is dumb. I don't even know if the writer has looked at the bill proposal, just scanned the inane arguments that other people who haven't read it either. The thing states that they will be able to block sites that are trying to distribute the copyrighted material. Not peoples fan movies, montages, etc. These things generate a LOT of free advertisement for the entertainment industry. The only thing that will be concerned are sites that let you download pirated games/movies/etc, or sites that enable people to do the same. To anyone moaning about "censorship" and freedom of speech, etc. give it up. This is the industry taking a firm stance against piracy that is slowly killing the core games market. Unless you want the future of gaming to be a million different "villes" or Angry Birds 1080p Super HD 3D deluxe part XXXIII. Then you will just have to live with actually paying for the games you love.