Spartan446's forum posts

Avatar image for Spartan446
Spartan446

54262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

101

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Spartan446
Member since 2002 • 54262 Posts

OK, I think this thread is going to be locked, I've never seen so much fanboyism in one thread in System Wars history. And I've seen this board since 2004.ChrisSpartan117

getting a thread locked just because you disagree with an opinion:roll:

Avatar image for Spartan446
Spartan446

54262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

101

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Spartan446
Member since 2002 • 54262 Posts
[QUOTE="SuperSaiyanLink"][QUOTE="quizee"] im going by gamerankings.com cuz gamespot reviews are bunkChrisSpartan117
This is gamespot.com we go by gamespot scores.

Too bad GS picked SMG for GOTY over Halo 3.

pity goty
Avatar image for Spartan446
Spartan446

54262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

101

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Spartan446
Member since 2002 • 54262 Posts
[QUOTE="Johnny-n-Roger"][QUOTE="unknown37"]excuse me? How the hell are you gonna tell me what I own, just because I think a game is better than Halo? http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z266/jayx37/IMG_6369.jpgunknown37
Because it's obvious that the Halo franchise is far superior to these pointless rehashes.

If it was so superior to these franchises, then at least one of the Halo games would have got a 10 like OoT

the 90s are over get over it
Avatar image for Spartan446
Spartan446

54262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

101

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Spartan446
Member since 2002 • 54262 Posts
The Wii doesn't need Halo 3. The Wii has sold more game systems than what Halo 3 sold for copies.dream431ca
selling bowling simulators to senior citizens doesn't make wii good
Avatar image for Spartan446
Spartan446

54262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

101

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Spartan446
Member since 2002 • 54262 Posts

I loved Halo 3 but I'm pretty sure that those with a Wii only and Nintendo Fanboys don't really care about Halo. We'll leave it at that.

lebanese_boy
of course. if they had an xbox and halo, they wouldn't be nintendo fanboys. it would completely change the way they see games. nintendo 64 era gameplay wouldn't cut it anymore
Avatar image for Spartan446
Spartan446

54262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

101

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Spartan446
Member since 2002 • 54262 Posts
Mario, Zelda, MP, NMH, and Brawl were all better than Halo 3. Not that Halo 3 is bad, but people really overrate Halo 3unknown37
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Only owns a Wii
Avatar image for Spartan446
Spartan446

54262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

101

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Spartan446
Member since 2002 • 54262 Posts
[QUOTE="Spartan446"]

reviewers said prime 3 was nothing special and that it's totally outclassed by halo 3

i think they're right

Cherokee_Jack
Reviews compared it to Halo 3? For that matter, reviews said it was nothing special? Which ones?

gamespot gave halo 3 a 9.5, but gave metroid prime 3 8,5. this pretty much says it all. prime 3 isn't even in the same class as halo. i'm sorry your personal bias has clouded you from seeing what everyone else sees clearly.
Avatar image for Spartan446
Spartan446

54262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

101

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Spartan446
Member since 2002 • 54262 Posts
[QUOTE="Spartan446"][QUOTE="WAIW"]

It's a 3D platformer... It's supposed to be a single player game... Not eveything needs multiplayer.

Cherokee_Jack

That's a cop out, just because Nintendo doesn't how to implement multiplayer properly. galaxy was dated the minute it came out.

What other platformers have worthwhile online co-op?

so you're admitting that platformers are a stale genre thanks for conceding my point
Avatar image for Spartan446
Spartan446

54262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

101

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Spartan446
Member since 2002 • 54262 Posts

reviewers said prime 3 was nothing special and that it's totally outclassed by halo 3

i think they're right