Well it was gonna come up eventually with the sales being double the 360's and they hammered the PS3 for even longer and now having 4X the sales of them. The Wii is doing a good job but it's still not a console I care anything about.
The PS3 despite being in a honey moon period (when there has been less than a year out on stores so plenty of potential buyers and has had time to produce games) and a price cut still sold less than the Xbox 360 in America. Bad omens for the PS3.
Unfortunately I don't trust reviews anymore because they are simply biased. biased to popularity, a game like GTA vice city in my opinion should have scored a 7 or maybe just a 7.5 because it had bad graphics, bad gameplay, outdated aiming system, bad dialogue, monotynous missions and so forth but because the reviewers know it will be popular they give it incredibly high ratings. Same with pretty much every nintendo franchise etc. Heavenly sword is only 7 hours long, 7 hours!!! I cannot trust the game to get a 10 rating with 7 hours of gameplay and I've heard some very fair criticism e.g. the final battle being a mess because the hundreds of enemy surrounding you are amost impossible to counter and fight effectively etc. The game is just a graphical showcase and may be fun but reviews being good aren't to be trusted. I wouldn't trust reviews for any major title.
Same as above posters just consider if it's really good to sell the 360. Depending on what games you want depends on which will be the best to keep/buy, the PS3 seems more interesting to me but the Xbox 360 has more games and you don't need to pay for it since you've already got one. Look up the exclusives and let the games decide.
It looked pretty good but nothing amazing, the stances are natural but it's just like changing a weapon affects your moves in Ninja Gaiden. I will reserve judgement till I know what the after touch stuff is and I actually play the game to say whether I find the shaking of the pad to be a good feature or not.
vegeta attack15, how can you say that people cannot say a game looks boring if you think that they can think a game looks good? How do people decide what games they like, it's by thinking of what they like (genre, features, graphics, game type e.g. turn based or real time) and deciding on what they know and have seen so yes he can say he finds a game boring just like you can say you like the look of it.
I personally like the look of Killzone 2 but I am ultimately unimpressed with it.
Lair looks really cool in my opinion, certainly the most interesting game on the PS3 in my opinion.
The price is the only real issue, everything else is cool in my opinion. If you can't get rid of the price (A free PS3 would be rockin XD) I would want to get rid of the dust and fingerprint attracting material it's made of and replace it with something that doesn't get dust and fingerprint marks.
There's no need to get rid of Home really, even if you don't like it you just don't use it. Anything extra is better than nothing and to have a new layer added to the online experience makes it surpass Xbox live.
Log in to comment