How about hidden bullsheeiit games? you know, all those who are overrated and are actually sheeiit. All COD games for example...

[QUOTE="codymcclain14"][QUOTE="Sheik2"]

I used to play the MAG trial, but then it came to a point that when I wanted to play a match, it took years to enter a game. Same thing happens with uncharted 2 in some games modes. The best experience I have had in online games with my ps3 is with Bad Company 2. It takes just seconds to sign in and join a match. Also you can find your friends very easy. This game is less than 20 bucks now and it rocks. Also, it was the LAST battlefield game without the stupid online pass, so you can rent it to test it, get borrowed by a friend or buy it used ;)

Killzone 3 was fun too...

TheFLCLPope88

Actually there is (was?) kind of an online pass, if you you bought the game new you got a PSN code ("V.I.P. pass") that unlocks all the multiplayer maps, where as without the code I think it limits you to about 5 maps or so. However this was about 2 years ago, I'm not sure if EA decided to unlock the maps for everyone since.

As for DLC avoid the co-op pack as no one ever played it.

i wouldn't say so. the resistance games always just felt cheap, especially with all the other quality fps games out there.

idunnodude

[QUOTE="ristactionjakso"]

Everything about the resistance series sucks, except for Resistance 3 campaign.

If you want a new shooter expierence buy Far Cry 3, Crysis 1, Boishock, RAGE, or just Resistance 3 for the campaign.

But if you wanted a collections, the Killzone trilogy isn't all that bad. The remade KZ1 looks and plays smoothly, and it comes with all KZ2 and KZ3 dlc.

Nengo_Flow

Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots. There were only 2 bad points in this game. The first one and the most important: You need to play almost all previous metal gear games to understand the story. Otherwise you will be completly lost. The other bad point was the looooong cutscenes (some of those unnecesary).

Now there is a third bad point: No more metal gear online (the multiplayer component of this game) since june 2012.

Anyway, when it still had MGO, and if played previous metal gear games to understand the story, this was by far THE BEST ps3 exclusive title. Nothing can compare to this masterpiece. Not even Uncharted games. It could be a game of 2008, but until now, january 2013, they haven't created another game like this.

Never player any resistance games, just the FOM demo. I wanted a new FPS experience that is NOT call of duty, and with the posibility of playing splitscreen. Buying the 3 games for only 40 bucks seems a good deal and some people say the story is good... should I buy it?

I used to play the MAG trial, but then it came to a point that when I wanted to play a match, it took years to enter a game. Same thing happens with uncharted 2 in some games modes. The best experience I have had in online games with my ps3 is with Bad Company 2. It takes just seconds to sign in and join a match. Also you can find your friends very easy. This game is less than 20 bucks now and it rocks. Also, it was the LAST battlefield game without the stupid online pass, so you can rent it to test it, get borrowed by a friend or buy it used ;)

Killzone 3 was fun too...

The first resistance is actually great for this, Your friend and you can play splitscreen deathmatch up to 4 players. Or you could play splitscreen mini matches with teams based shooting. For an added bonus you guys can play the entire single player campaign splitscreen, Also play on the hardest difficulty because the AI in that game is impressive and its very fun. On 2 and 3 it doesnt allow these features, They tried their own but I personally wish they brought back the features from oneRednrol

So I am a PS3 owner and I like inviting friends to play splitscreen. We have fun playing Sonic Racing Transformed and Modern Warfare 3. But some days ago I decided to try something new, preferably another shooter except COD. I wanted killzone 3 at first but then I found out that it only has co-op splitscreen but NOT competitive. Then I was thinking in buying the new "Resistance Collection" (never player none of the 3). Then a guy that uploaded a resistance 3 video told me that you need to login online to play splitscreen (just like Starhawk, I think?), meaning that if I don't have internet connection at the moment for X reason, I can't play with my friend... WTF is this sheeiit? Why?

Anyway, I don't own those games yet so who knows for sure. Can you guys confirm or explain better this fact?

Also, I would appreciate your recomendations for offline splitscreen in the PS3 until now, january 2013!

BTW happy new year...

First of all, medal of honor games suck very bad, I will leave that opinion for another time. Anyway, I'm gonna give you my personal analysis about the two most important SERIES, which are COD and BF series. Maybe someone said something similar before, but here we go:

In the first place, they have different gameplay, like the use of vehicles, but I'm gonna talk about other more important things right now. Both series have their pros and cons. For consoles, COD games are better. For PC, definitely Battlefield games, specially BF3 (console versions have less functions, lower graphics and they only support 24 players instead of 64, among other things). Why is COD better on consoles? well, to begin with, BF games DO NOT support offline multiplayer. So if you want to play with friends, you better pray they have the same console, the same game and a good internet connection. Also, the console versions of most COD games have less bugs than BF games, something that in my experience, it can be a great change in how you have fun. I can also mention similar reasons like multiplayer coop, etc.

Another reason why I prefer COD over BF3 is because of the **** online pass. It has been proven many times that EA games use online passes without any rational arguments. In short, they wan't to rip you off... but this NEVER happends with a COD game. You can play multiplayer if a friend sells you the game, or if he lends it to you or if you rent the game. If you want to "test" BF3 multiplayer, I'm afraid you'll need to buy it new or buy the online pass of 10 dollars.

Now here goes the most important part of my post: Please, STOP thinking the same **** about "realism" in games. BF3 is not realistic at all either (i.e. do you consider realistic destroying grates and boxes with a single knife slash? LOL). Don't listen to all those trolls, COD became a victim of trolling but that's it, NO ONE trolls BF3 for its flaws for some reason. Both are fun, but both arcade shooters. If you want something like a simulator you can play ARMA or Operation Flashpoint series.

I can tell you, I own a PS3 and I was VERY disappointed with Bad Company 2 because of the visual bugs. Very fun game, but with many bugs that COD games don't have. And guess what? console version of BF3 has a lot more bugs!!!

So my final opinion is this: Apart of the problem of online passes, if you own a PC, your best choice will be Battlefield 3. If you own a console, you will have more fun with COD, specially if you want to invite a friend to play local splitscreen.

Nothing special in this common discussion all over the internet. Battlefield was made for PC, COD games were made for consoles. Simple as that.

Sorry for the long post, but I guess that's the most important things you need to know. Choose wise.
Farewell :)