the fanboys will start therre petitions again, its patheticshadystxxx
Â
Just like the 'other' console fanboys would do. Â
the fanboys will start therre petitions again, its patheticshadystxxx
Â
Just like the 'other' console fanboys would do. Â
OMG The_TomboÂ
That signature image of yours on the left is absolutely priceless!!!:D
I have FFVII for computer (somewhere that is) but wouldn't mind picking up other versions as well.Â
Â
Â
ye there is i just herd about it todayb2r4a6n8d10
Â
Then how about sharing a link with us!! Your subject should have also been stated better. How about "Possible new PSP model". You state this as FACT when all in all, you have no idea yourself. You 'herd' about it today. Where?? From a friend? On the news? Website? Blog? eMail? Mass marketing promotion? Your Mom? The family dog? You get my point??Â
would the store BEST BUY and FRY's Electornic carry it? ZnLRyDa
Â
Carry what???? What do you mean by WiFi? If you OWNED a PSP (remember, you did post in the PSP forums) or did a little research, you would know that the PSP is already wireless network capable. Be more specific before hitting thecreate a thread option. You will get many inciteful and helpful replies that do not border on the verge of flaming.Â
how can you tell if u have dead pixels?
 PSP107
Â
How do you think?? When you see tiny little dots that don't correspond to the colors that SHOULD be shown for THAT area, you have DEAD PIXELS.Â
[QUOTE="dubvisions"]Oh I think it's quite obvious why GS gave it a lesser rating, especially the .1 score lower but according to one of the posted stickys we're not allowed to talk about it. Read nearly every review that's been posted about the game and look at the video floating around online that shows you the differences. Use your own eyes and you'll see there is NO WAY it should have gotten a lower score. But that's all I'm going to say... otherwise I'm sure I'd find a nasty warning in my box. You wrote EXACTLY what was on my mind!! Great job.So, I read the review and I don;t see anywhere where the PS3 version deserves .1 less of a score than 360. They state that the load times are better than the 360. They say most everything else is equal. The only negative, if you call it that, was that the PS3 version didn;t have all of the "add-ons." But isn;t that why they are called "add-ons?" Did the 360 version have these add-ons when GS originally gave the 9.6 score?
It just appears to me that they just want to keep that 360 on top. Even if its just .1 of a difference, the difference is still there. Plus, don't you think all of those add-ons will become available later? The devlopers already stated that hey didn;t want to include all of the add-ins because it would be pointless for someone just starting the game.
Does this bother anyone else?
The_G00se
[QUOTE="Xanog1"]That doesn't confirm anything, although I would like Dead Rising if Capcom felt like sticking to the "Everyone deserves to play this great game" mentality that they now exhibit towards DMC4, just about two weeks after saying that it would be their last exclusive game.feel_freetwothe fact that one of the ps3 touted exculsives went multiplatform, does comfirm that capcom has no loyalties. again the claim isnt that we will see dead rising or lost planet exactly. the claim is that lost planet 2 and dead rising 2 and all future capcom games will make there way to the ps3. Then why make a thread title like this? While I would love to see those titles come to the PS3, one game jumping ship to another console does not mean that others will start doing the same to the PS3. It's this type of MIS-INFORMATION that gets people all jazzed up for absolutely nothing.
Log in to comment