I don't know about you guys, but I felt like Bryan winning the title at SummerSlam wasn't much of a payoff. Sure, it's been built-up to wonderfully if you trace his whole career, since NO ONE thought he would even make it in the WWE, let alone accomplish what he's accomplished.

The problem is that as far as WWE is concerned, Bryan had been tagging with Kane for almost a year, entered a feud with Orton, got the fans behind him, and then just beat Cena. There's no real WWE storyline build-up for Bryan winning the title. It may be an awesome moment for IWC marks, but Cena just sort of chose Bryan as his opponent and then Bryan won. This new twist in the story creates a long, built-up pursuit for Bryan to finally have a huge moment, likely at Mania. 

I'm not sure if this has been talked about yet but it bums me out how Bryan's first-ever title reign was a reign where you knew he couldn't really celebrate and was going to be f*cked a few minutes later. I wanted him to have his Eddie at No Way Out, Benoit at WM XX, or CM Punk at MITB moment but he won't have that now. JML897

I've never been more fond of Triple H, to be honest. At least now I'm intrigued.

I haven't watched a full Raw in months but after last night, I'm actually upset that I have to work tonight and can't watch. 

[QUOTE="Razor-Lazor"]Given how you phrased that, I'm a bit confused, but I would just like to clarify to everyone that Bryan's reign was definitely not the shortest reign in history. I know it makes zero difference, but still.TruthTellers

Del Rio's alright in the ring, but every time he has a match, I don't watch it.TruthTellers