Randolph's forum posts

Avatar image for Randolph
Randolph

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

49

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Randolph
Member since 2002 • 10542 Posts

Man hits man, hit person strikes back. Self defense. Woman hits man and is hit back, victim is arrested, female criminal gets away with it. EQUALITY LOL

Avatar image for Randolph
Randolph

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

49

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 Randolph
Member since 2002 • 10542 Posts

Edgy thread/10

Avatar image for Randolph
Randolph

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

49

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By Randolph
Member since 2002 • 10542 Posts

Every time my Internet goes down or a problem happens to psn or xbl, all my xbone digital games canot be played at all, and a few notable ps4 games as well. Always go physical when the option is there.

Avatar image for Randolph
Randolph

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

49

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 Randolph
Member since 2002 • 10542 Posts

@lamprey263: under certain situations it's actually legal for an officer to shoot a fleeing suspect, including if that person assaulted an officer. Mike Brown died becuase he was a violent idiot.

Avatar image for Randolph
Randolph

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

49

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Randolph
Member since 2002 • 10542 Posts

@GrenadeLauncher: Killer Instinct is far better than Metacritic shows. Those are reviews made up of takes from when the game was released with only six characters and a lack of options. KI is a legit great fighting game.

Avatar image for Randolph
Randolph

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

49

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 Randolph
Member since 2002 • 10542 Posts

Please go away. Your threads are all terrible, your posting habits are terrible, and no one on this website likes you. GO. AWAY.

Avatar image for Randolph
Randolph

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

49

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By Randolph
Member since 2002 • 10542 Posts

@McStrongfast said:

I've been here for, well, got an account in 2005 or some such. What a waste. Goodbye System Wars. You always sucked. I hope you die.

Gutless sniveling coward.

@super600 said:

I think she does that because people have wrote really vile things or harassed her in the past in the youtube comments.

She does it because the comments section would quickly fill up with retorts to her paper thin arguments, or comments pointing out how much of her material was lifted from other peoples work, (thereby questioning why she needed so much money to do something so many other people do and do better for free all the time) she was unable to properly retort so she disabled comments, claimed it was because of abuse, and asked for more money. The media then only reports what she says as fact, and lumps in all the legitimate criticism that completely leveled every point she ever brought up with the abusive commenters.

The woman has never been properly brought to task by the media, because the media is (non-literally in this case unlike Seriously Who) in bed with her. Any attempts to get her in a environment where she can be properly and publicly challenged are declined, or conveniently timed and highly dubious "death threats" make her scared to show up. She and her partners in the media know that the second she is properly and publicly challenged in a debate setting that she is DONE. The ultimate paper tiger.

Avatar image for Randolph
Randolph

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

49

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 Randolph
Member since 2002 • 10542 Posts

@blue_hazy_basic said:

@WozzaBoi said:

@blue_hazy_basic said:

Honestly alot of the GG crowd make me uncomfortable (not just the tiny mental minority sending death threats) but I agree with many of the principles it has brought up. However, the way its being reported on sites like the BBC is an absolute disgrace and a perfect example of why GG became so popular in the first place. Incestuous gaming "journos" backslapping each other while purporting to report the "news". The BBC article was just a hatchet job like so many pieces in the mainstream outlets who have no real concept about what is going on and are being forcefed talking points without doing any of their own research.

curious, what is it about "alot of the GG crowd" that makes you uncomfortable?

Fanaticism

You don't see fanaticism on the SJW side? Their are fanatical lunatics in every possible political, religious, or ideological group on the planet. I will continue to be a proud supporter of Gamergate because I refuse to let a bunch of sniveling pseudo intellectual hipster twats tell me how I can and cannot define myself. I used to let these pieces of human garbage have influence over me in my hobby, but the genie is out of the bottle, and it can't go back in.

They want diversity in gaming? So do we. We want the diversity that would allow a games journalist to thrive in his or her chosen profession while having a different political/religious/ideological viewpoint than the majority of their peers without fear of being fired and blacklisted. Wouldn't that be adding to diversity within the industry?

Avatar image for Randolph
Randolph

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

49

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 Randolph
Member since 2002 • 10542 Posts

@JustPlainLucas said:

Just thought I'd add this.

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/jimquisition/9695-Quit-Using-The-Term-Social-Justice-Warriors

I especially like what he said about Anita Sarkeesian. Just because you say someone's not deserving of abuse does not make you an SJW. In fact, I really hate that term now.

I'm looking forward to a more direct response to what I posted than an attempt at distraction and misdirection.

Avatar image for Randolph
Randolph

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

49

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Randolph
Member since 2002 • 10542 Posts

Where is the GS article on the death threats against supporters of Gamer Gate?

BTW, another slanted and poorly researched opinion piece on CNN popped up, it was bile inducing. But I found a real gem in the comments.

As a female supporter of Gamergate, this article makes me absolutely cringe. Horrible. If you can't write a piece that accurately describes what Gamergate is about, please, just don't bother. The journalism ethics is what pulled me in initially, but the broadening scope of neo-feminists and sex-negative feminists - who do NOT speak for all women - deeply disturbed me. I have been a gamer since I was a child and have never been made to feel the way these women, some of whom ARE NOT EVEN GAMERS AT ALL (I'm looking at you, Anita Sarkeesian, who claims in her video series to love games but then can be found in another clip saying she doesn't know much about games and had to do a lot of research for the project, all the while cherrypicking examples and using them completely out of context) say they supposedly feel.

And please, do not hold Leigh Alexander up as a pinnacle of *anything* - I urge you to go look at some of the tweets she's made over the last several years. She's as vitriolic and bullying as anyone on the Gamergate side might be. I have personally felt more bullied and vilified in one month of reading about Gamergate than I have in more than 25 years of being a gamer. I'm a proponent of equal - read that, EQUAL - rights for everyone. What some of the anti-GG movement moves toward goes well beyond that, to preferential treatment for females, elimination of the patriarchy, and a mindset that sex is an awful and shameful thing. If you don't want to play those games - DON'T. Play other games. Patronize developers that make the games you want. But don't spoil gaming for the rest of us by trying to change the entire culture.

There *is* room for everyone, but that means people backing off and respecting the fact there will always be some game released that someone isn't comfortable with. And please, for the love of everything unholy, someone research the ethical issues with the collusion of the major gaming "journalism" sites, their use of Patreon to fund developers they like (and subsequently give good reviews to), and the whole debacle behind IndieCade. Come back with an article, CNN, that actually addresses all these things. I sincerely urge anyone who read this article to go seek out a Huffington Post interview from last week with three female Gamergate supporters.

The problem with almost every piece in the mainstream media right now is that they are only covering one side - and when they are covering the pro-Gamergate side, it is still severely slanted toward being anti-GG. I'm just tired of it, and I'm tired of feminists trying to speak for me simply because of my gender - sort of ironic, isn't it? No matter how much I tell them their views aren't mine, they continue to insist that I must listen and believe because they supposedly know what's best for me - to the point of being harassing, rude, condescending, and denigrating a hobby I've had for more than a quarter of a century.

So yeah, lets not forget about #notyourshield, and the way it shone a light on the anti-GG/SJW faction having every bit as many misogynists, racists, and homophobes as the GG side does. It's kind of like how they are actually just as many racists in the north of the USA as the South, just in different forms and at different volumes.