@faizanhd Don't antagonize him, this conversation is invalid, nothing is better after 2?? what the heck??

@kingcrimson24 I'm soooo with you brother, even if i was offered less superior Arkham city game, I'd pick up in a heartbeat

@MapRef41N93W I feel you, but if you are looking for something so different and better than current arkham formula, there are plenty of unique games out there to satisfy your need :-) maybe you the expectation bar above the rooftop? since it was being developed by a new studio, they would never change something that isn't broken, whereas me, I just couldn't get enough of previous 2 arkham games, If i was offered less superior arkham city games i'd play it in a hearbeat.

@MapRef41N93W But still mediocre is pretty bad word ;-) at least decent would have been nice

@Mevrick But you really can't review entire game solely on your personal taste i think, based on Carylin's comment she favors FPS games like CoD over action adventure games, therefore her opinion neglates the game score, Arkham Origins got 8 or something on Metacritics, that is saying much!!! I'm sure some big fans reviews CoD here on gamespot!!

@MapRef41N93W You wanted third person shooter out of Origins, It is Arkham formula after all, If it is clunky boring diisapointing as you say, you really should blame arkham asylum or city, no?

@carolynmichelle Soo you are saying first person shooter doesn't need much innovation and guaranteed 9 point every year, and other genres like action adventure needs so much innovation on sequels, this is the standard????? you are going round round with your words,

@D4RKL1NG Copy&paste is not that bad, arkham formula is strong enough for one time use, Arkham City was 9 i think 2 years later exact same game deserves 6? then how the hell CoD get 9 everytime

@reddevilofhell Very good point

Haven't been played the game yet, not sure I'm pissed, but definitely gutted, since I'm a huge fan I'll enjoy the game nonetheless