Krelian-co's forum posts

Avatar image for Krelian-co
#1 Edited by Krelian-co (13274 posts) -

@skelly34 said:

@Krelian-co: Let's play a game.

if you can't name 10 xbox1 games going to PC or don't respond I'll post a hilarious owned gif I tucked away and make a thread about this. If you post 10-15 xbox games going to PC... I'll laugh as you're still in no position to talk shit about Microsoft as Sony is doing the same shit, but I'll give you due respect because you rebuked my initial point. If you can post 16+ games then I'll admit I was wrong and stop posting.

Ready? Go!

Edit: Time is running out Krelian.

of course you would make excuses and of course you would change what you asked for after you got owned, a true lem, but since this is a game, and you of course are a bad loser, i hope to see your list with the exact same rules of ps4 games going to pc. I'll post mine tomorrow, and i hope to see yours, whoever has more wins.

Go.

Avatar image for Krelian-co
#2 Edited by Krelian-co (13274 posts) -

@skelly34 said:
@skelly34 said:
@Krelian-co said:
@skelly34 said:
@Krelian-co said:

so you will get them for pc too? why do you even have an xbone then? why would anyone with a gaming pc would have an xbone, oh well, thanks for proving my point, xbone is irrelevant with a gaming pc, glad we agree.

So is PS4.

Sure it is, because the ps4 is the one making every single game multiplat, is this the new lem excuse now? xD

The PS4 is dumping more of its would-be exclusives onto PC than even Microsoft is.

Here's a list just for you:

  • Shenmue 3
  • FFVII:R
  • No Man's Sky
  • Street Fighter V
  • Firewatch
  • Crossing Souls
  • Rocket League
  • Nobunaga's Ambition
  • Tales of Zestiria
  • Samurai Warriors
  • FFXV (almost confirmed)

All games that Sony secured away from Xbox1 or otherwise had a hand in but are still receiving a PC port. Soon to be many, many more I assure you.

Not the lem excuse so much as a hermit laughing at one console gamer feeling himself more important than another console gamer. Between Microsoft's and Sony's death battle only PC truly prospers.

Well, what do you think? Think you can name more than 11 games Xbox1 is losing to PC? If you actually can I'll be impressed.

Yeah, I didn't think you could.

6180 the moon

Acorn Assault: Rodent Revolution

Dead Rising 3

Killer Instinct

The Long Dark

Massive Chalice

Plague Inc: Evolved

Ryse

State of Decay

Smite

World of Tanks

TitanFall

Rise of Tomb Raider

There 15, i am pretty sure i forgot some and i didn't use "almost confirmed", in b4 excuses.

Avatar image for Krelian-co
#3 Posted by Krelian-co (13274 posts) -

k

Avatar image for Krelian-co
#4 Edited by Krelian-co (13274 posts) -

1152x810 in 2015? is the garbagebox really that weak, lol. MUH CLOUD, MUH DIRECTX

Xbox One has power of 10 Xbox 360 consoles, says Microsoft, and the power becomes "infinite" with cloud technology

Avatar image for Krelian-co
#5 Posted by Krelian-co (13274 posts) -

@Salt_The_Fries said:

@Legend002: Actually they're has been many of them since last generation and your post is yet another example of hyperbolized fanbot propaganda. Mass Effect was 2nd party exclusive, PGR too however it was also 2nd party. Battlestations series, two games, also appeared only on Xbox not on PS. Same for Football Manager up til certain point, Tropico games also used to come out on Xbox only on consoles up till very recently. I could list dozens of examples. Whatever you listed for Sony is rather insignificant in the grand scheme of things, apart from cult but still niche Persona and the latest Yakuza game hasn't come out in the West.

i don't think you know what the word exclusive means, none of those games were ever exclusive. "Not on PS" has become the number 1 idiotic excuse for you lembots, but that doesn't make a game exclusive, want me to give you a dictionary?

Avatar image for Krelian-co
#6 Edited by Krelian-co (13274 posts) -

@jg4xchamp said:
@Krelian-co said:

but again it is the only, or rather the best way to objectively qualify a game

No it isn't, because there is nothing objective about it. It's a series of subjective opinions put in one giant algorithm that ultimately gives you that multiple people believe this, but not "X game is this". Major difference. A general consensus is also a logical fallacy because "many people believe so, it must be so" is technically false, many people can still be wrong. Ergo not objective.

Reality is entertainment can't actually be qualified and reduced to a series of numbers. That line of thinking in it of itself is flawed.

then feel free to propose a better way of having a general opinion about a game, it's true is a collection of opinions, but with a good enough sample it is enough to have a general opinion about the game, now as for the genral concensus being a fallacy that is applied to science, and facts, no such thing in gaming since there are no absolutes or hard facts, the most we get is an approximation or a general concensus, we are talking about how good a game is, there is no fact to be found in there, the only measurable way of defining if a game is good or bad is the general opinion. Now you may disagree with such general opinion but saying a game is bad with a 91 score is just moronic, which is why meta critic was brought to the conversation, people may say they don't like the game, big difference than saying the game is bad.

Avatar image for Krelian-co
#7 Posted by Krelian-co (13274 posts) -

@GreySeal9 said:
@Krelian-co said:
@GreySeal9 said:
@Krelian-co said:
@GreySeal9 said:
@StrongBlackVine said:

@Seabas989: 91 Metascore for Uncharted 3. Game over. Your opinion is worthless in comparison.

Metascore is really just a bunch of opinions. It's not gospel.

so we should go by your dumb opinion? xD

I didn't say that; not sure where you got that from. Plus I have nothing against UC. I dig the series.

I'm just saying that not everybody has to agree with the metascore. I'm sure there are games that you think are not good in spite of their metascore. For instance, I think Assassin's Creed is trash in spite of its good critical reception. If somebody brought up the metascore, I wouldn't really care.

i did't say everyone has to agree with metascores, but again it is the only, or rather the best way to objectively qualify a game, if we go by personal opinion there will never be a concensus, and what is more important, it is an easy way to shut up the people who are arguing that u1 and u3 are bad, so if you don't like meta critic feel free to offer a better way of giving a a game an objective qualification, it is not perfect, but is the best we have at the moment.

You are kind of implying that people need to agree with metascores. Why else would there even be a need to "shut up" people who think UC1 and UC3 are bad? It's fine to go against the consensus.

Why do I need to offer a way of giving a game an objective qualification? I'm fine with the fact that there's no truly objective measure. I'm fine with people thinking games that are widely thought of as being good are not good (tho I do sometimes poke fun at people's tastes). Now if somebody's making shit arguments, that's a different story.

i never said people have to agree with metacritic, what i am saying it is a good way to avoid dumb statements like the ones you did, for example, by meta critic you cannot say uncharted is a bad game, you can say you don't like it, but that's different, instead of saying it is a bad game because you didn't like it. And again, you can cry about meta critic all you want but unless you offer a better alternative i don't see the reason, it is a collective opinion thus a general concensus about a game, not once did i say you have to think the same but saying it is a bad uncharted 1 and 3 are bad games is simply moronic.

Avatar image for Krelian-co
#8 Posted by Krelian-co (13274 posts) -

We all knew it was coming, only delusional lems were still in denial.

bu bu bu i bet it won't come to ps4!!!!

meh, getting it for pc anyway.

Avatar image for Krelian-co
#9 Posted by Krelian-co (13274 posts) -

@-God- said:
@Krelian-co said:

You have yet to refute the OP.

You are the only one destroyed, Mr.TinFoilHat.

I bet you are happy we get Farcry5 with this game.

sure keep arguing that fallout is the same as far cry and batman, it does not make you look you dumb AT ALL, especially after i just destroyed you with several differences, keep grasping straws my good hipster.

Avatar image for Krelian-co
#10 Posted by Krelian-co (13274 posts) -

@GreySeal9 said:
@Krelian-co said:
@GreySeal9 said:
@StrongBlackVine said:

@Seabas989: 91 Metascore for Uncharted 3. Game over. Your opinion is worthless in comparison.

Metascore is really just a bunch of opinions. It's not gospel.

so we should go by your dumb opinion? xD

I didn't say that; not sure where you got that from. Plus I have nothing against UC. I dig the series.

I'm just saying that not everybody has to agree with the metascore. I'm sure there are games that you think are not good in spite of their metascore. For instance, I think Assassin's Creed is trash in spite of its good critical reception. If somebody brought up the metascore, I wouldn't really care.

i did't say everyone has to agree with metascores, but again it is the only, or rather the best way to objectively qualify a game, if we go by personal opinion there will never be a concensus, and what is more important, it is an easy way to shut up the people who are arguing that u1 and u3 are bad, so if you don't like meta critic feel free to offer a better way of giving a a game an objective qualification, it is not perfect, but is the best we have at the moment.