The online passes were ridiculous especially for games like Army of Two. EA is gradually gaining my respect back however as others are speculating, they probably have another plan in store for making money.
For anyone thinking about buying this game pre-owned, be aware that an online pass is required to play with your friends online.....even though you already pay to play online and the campaign is the only substance in the game. I never though EA would stoop that low but then again it is EA.
I actually liked Alpha and Bravo...Alpha's the one that gets stuff done and Bravo is the smartass. Bravo AI was definitely not mediocre and was actually useful. Although, there's names are kind of generic along with the story. Still like the game though and it seems as if the story is longer than the other games. The dialogue was funny considering they were kind of making fun of the game. To each their own I agree that TDC is a generic shooter with oodles of mindless thugs but it does deliver in what it's ultimate goal; to be a good co-op game something that is far and few these days.
The thing is, COD zombies isn't supposed to be realistic, it's just an added feature for people to enjoy. Weird because I like Treyarch games lol. MOH's graphics are pretty good especially the cut scenes but the character models are honestly something you would see last gen.....actually, they kind of remind me of Oblivion's character models in all honestly. To be perfectly fair, I really can't judge Far Cry 3's graphics because I haven't played the game yet but they look good from my perspective. What game are you using to compare graphics with so I can get an idea from your point of view in regards to graphics. Picking flowers is boring I will admit that but aren't they just side missions or bonus features as in you don't have to do them? I'm sure there is at least one mission where you have to pick them for the scientist but that isn't too incredibly bad is it?
Better than buying guns from a wall in Call of Duty zombies lol. Sorry Far Cry 3 doesn't meet your expectations. Don't know if you played Fallout 3 but that has guns and a RPG element and it works out just fine for a lot of people. Also, Far Cry 3 is a mix of shooting, driving, and so on thus if you want a casual shooter, look elsewhere. Good input though. Oh and to be fair, Far Cry 3's graphics look a lot better than MOH:Warfighter's, well at least in regards to character models at least.
I know right! It doesn't make any sense. Tom Clancy games are wonderful just in the fact that they include local co-op....not many games do that anymore.
Yep. It was ok, but defintely the worst in the series in my opinion. Future Soldier is a tactical stelath game which, unfortunately, people tend to dislike these days. People are used to shooters like Call of Duty where it's just run and gun so when a tactical stealth game such as Shooter Soldier comes out, people don't know what to make of it. As long as you like the game, no one else's opinions matter....just yours. FS is defintely a 9.0 in my book.
7.5 is good but this game is alot better. For the campaign, there are both stealth and tema aspects wich makes the game more interesting and challenging. You can also customize your loadout before the mission which is a fantastic feature. There is also personallity between the characters which makes the game more lively.
Guerilla Mode really isn't interesting and is just another horde mode. Defintely the lest exciting part of the game.
Multiplayer focuses on team based strategy. You don't win for getting kills, you win by taking objectives. Not many games focus on team strategy to win which is quite refreshing instead of pointlessly killing enemies.
Overall, this game deserves a 8.5 in my opinion. 7.5 is still a good score though.
JCSBEARMEAT's comments