Right well your brain is clearly switched off.

On PC all those games running on that engine ran like Dog sh**. Fallout 4 required a 980 to run at 60FPS at 1440p, anything weaker than that you were on 40-50FPS at 1080p.

You needed to wait for the 10 series like I did to get the game at 4K 60FPS.

Current console hardware has no bottleneck and is x86, if the game runs bad on a console like a series X like elden ring did?... Guess what the PC equivilent a RTX 2060, struggle with the same settings and resolution and got the same framerate.

1200p 30fps on a series X?... unless you have a 2080 ti or better good luck trying to get 60FPS on anything above 1440p without running at console settings which you laughed at.

Buddy this game is running off the Creation engine and is heavily updated... It will be broken.

As for your logic about settings, a magical setting or two that will make the game run at 60FPS being there and the developer wouldn't use it?... In a world where 60fps options are the norm on consoles?

I think you guys laughing at the performance cant seem to connect the dots that just maybe the game will run like dog s*** on everything which is why I used those two games as a example.

This is not the custom silicon with alien level platforms on consoles, if a game does not offer a 60fps on a PS5 or Series X then get your helmet ready your in for a crash course of a PC release.

Clueless?....

So the game running at 1200p 30fps on a 12TFLOP console isn't giving you any clues to how its going to run on PC?

You do realise that since consoles went x86 is almost a 1:1 indicator of how its going to run on pc, meaning you will need a $2k PC to get this thing running at 4k 60fps on high/ultra.

Worse by the day? oh how is Cyberpunk or Jedi Survivor running for you 144hz monitor being fully utilised?... If its bad on console its really bad on PC.

I'm a PC gamer but you are just stupid.

Its called dynamic resolution.

You know when dirt ran at 900p on PS5 on a 1440p dynamic resolution.

1440p 30fps £250 console?... I mean no offense but you forum dwelling fanboys are just living in a cave if you think that a Series S is a bad deal.

You will probably need a £1000 PC to play 1440p 60fps.

Spoilt and delusional. Its why you guys killed the industry. Buying early access games, asking for better graphics, playing remakes.

DUMB!

I just finished Sanctuary on Netflix, pretty great... Leaves you wanting more which I hate, each season should end with some sort of conclusion and not a carrot on a stick type of ending.

Either way great.

So you can say the writers lost their way?...

Oh there are many things that determine performance, the quality of the developer doing the port, if the game is developed for that hardware first, on top of the hardware differences, the software involved and OS of that console and so on.

On PC you can only judge TFLOPS on the same architecture anything else is dumb.

Console vs console like PS4 vs X1 and PS5 vs XSX makes sense due to the SOC's being the same architecture.

But Switch vs anything or XSX/PS5 vs PC?... It gets complex and futile to compare.

Its pointless.

Like a Switch 2 having 1.4TFLOP with 2x the memory bandwidth and memory bit bus with more CPU cores and VRAM... Is the difference between what Witcher 3 looks like now 720p on Switch Vs sold 30FPS 1080p Medium settings, it will be a bigger difference than Wii U vs Switch 2x TFLOP jump BOTW 720p vs 900p same settings.

Biggest issue Switch has is CPU and memory bandwidth along with RAM, the GPU is only part of the problem.

Also a good way to debunk the Switch power and TFLOPS all at once... Wii U 0.35 TFLOPS and the Switch is 0.768TFLOPS?...

2x the TFLOPS and you get 900p instead of 720p at the same settings and framerate... in BOTW.

Not to mention the CPU performance, the memory bandwidth.

A good example of the TFLOP comparison being poor especially when it comes to handhelds with limited TDP is Steam deck at 1.64 TFLOPS... Putting it at almost PS4 level's which it is not, its borderline slower than a Xbox One.

Well if they are currently working on the Switch 2, and they plan on keep it at $299-350 price range... Chances are its going to be a high yield mass produced SOC so there's little to no chance of it being based off of Ada Lovelace 4nm is SLIM!

There's a very high probability the SOC will be based off of Ampere 8nm, and based on RTX 3050 mobile chips the slowest ones are 40w, a handheld SOC will need to be 12-15w... Meaning the slowest 3050 mobile chip cut by a third in performance.

You are looking at a handheld that will be able to play current games at low-medium at 30FPS... Like Elden Ring.

Its not going to change the Switch much really all you will get is another round up of $60-70 Switch 2 re-releases of games you are playing now but with no 60FPS option and lower resolution and quality.

It will be a rinse and repeat of what we have now, Only good thing is you will probably be able to play Zelda at 60fps.