FLamezero991's forum posts

Avatar image for FLamezero991
FLamezero991

2877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

101

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#1 FLamezero991
Member since 2005 • 2877 Posts
Unless you really want MGS and FF, I wouldn't advise you to get a PS3.
Avatar image for FLamezero991
FLamezero991

2877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

101

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#2 FLamezero991
Member since 2005 • 2877 Posts
Picky picky, why do you have to be so picky?
Avatar image for FLamezero991
FLamezero991

2877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

101

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#3 FLamezero991
Member since 2005 • 2877 Posts

PS3 exclusives already own 360 in 2008 and it's pretty much safe to say it going to get owned again in 2009.

PS3 getting God Of War 3, FFXIII, GT5 the real game Nuff said OWNED

manystylez

Why? Is it the getting people all hot headed that makes you happy, or are you just THAT ignorant?

Avatar image for FLamezero991
FLamezero991

2877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

101

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#4 FLamezero991
Member since 2005 • 2877 Posts

I miss a good single player. Multiplayer has corrupted the good single players out there. 95% of the 360's shooter library shows this. Thank god for games like BioShock and Guns of the Patriots.NAPK1NS

Why can't you just Bioshock and MGS? Guns of the Patriots didn't come out yet, so don't say its a great singleplayer game unless you've played and beat it...

Avatar image for FLamezero991
FLamezero991

2877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

101

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#5 FLamezero991
Member since 2005 • 2877 Posts

[QUOTE="FLamezero991"]Really, multiplayer is more of a luxury and a improvment on gameplay. I don't see why you would rather play splitscreen Halo over XBOX live HAlo. If you don't like multiplarer, fine, but having it, IMO, is better than not having it...soulsofblayck

Because I'd rather have people in my physical viscinity rather than playing online against strangers or absent friends and improving a rank which in reality equates for nothing.

Ok, fine, forget rank, but I'd rather have my full HD screen, rather than half, or a quarter of it. Don't get me wrong, I'm not some kind of nonsocial, internet badass wannabe, and I do like to hang out with my friends outside, in my house, and on Xbx. But I'd much rather have my full screen with the possibility of playing with other people. And yes, rank means nonthing, but I gotta stay competative with everything...

Avatar image for FLamezero991
FLamezero991

2877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

101

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#6 FLamezero991
Member since 2005 • 2877 Posts

I agree.

When I buy games its for the single player part of it not the multiplayer.

Multiplayer is fun, but it get old alot faster than single player for me.

Thats' why I often buy RPGs.

In generals I'd like games to last longer.

Games like call of duty 4 with a 6 hours single player are downright unacceptable for me.

I wish I could just pay like 15-20$ and buy the single player of call of duty, if I only want the single player part why can't I only pay for that?

Sliverwarrior

Thats a pretty unusal statement if ask me. I'm not bashing the fact you like RPG's, I just don't understand how you could think a singleplayer campaign stays alive longer than multiplayer play..

Avatar image for FLamezero991
FLamezero991

2877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

101

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#7 FLamezero991
Member since 2005 • 2877 Posts
Really, multiplayer is more of a luxury and a improvment on gameplay. I don't see why you would rather play splitscreen Halo over XBOX live HAlo. If you don't like multiplarer, fine, but having it, IMO, is better than not having it...
Avatar image for FLamezero991
FLamezero991

2877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

101

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#8 FLamezero991
Member since 2005 • 2877 Posts
Those future proof games that are coming out for the PS3....I actually want them to proove their worth. YOU HEAR THAT SONY! Do that, and I'm sold...
Avatar image for FLamezero991
FLamezero991

2877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

101

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#9 FLamezero991
Member since 2005 • 2877 Posts
Halo renews itself with new maps and still a very fun online. COD4 is a great game, but I wouldn't compare it to Halo 3 at all. Two totally diffrent games....
Avatar image for FLamezero991
FLamezero991

2877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

101

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#10 FLamezero991
Member since 2005 • 2877 Posts
[QUOTE="digi198816"][QUOTE="freakn3ss"]

Rpg vs fps and driving game ?? that's a weird comparison

stika

Hes doing graphics comparasion, not genre comparasion. I didnt know there was a rule saying two games of different genres couldnt be compared graphically :S

there are certain genres that shouldnt be compared graphically, usually WRPGs are not about the graphics, while FPS is the genre that pushes the graphics the most, whats next? comparing 3D tetris to crysis?

Crap, beat me to the punch...