[QUOTE="SenorGuapo"]U cant compare a pedophile with a homosexual, someone who wants to **** little kids has a fetish that may grow on to an overwhelming urge i think someone who has this "fetish" about having sex with young children start out with a small curiousity, untill they feed it, maybe by imagination, maybe with experience, untill that curiousity grows into a deep urge. Having sex with an child is wrong, and we shud condemn people who act their lust out in that way, and protect "willing" children(if those exsist) from these sexual predators. And for the pedophiles, or for some of the posters here who think pedophiles are "born" that way like gay people. I think a pedophile shud try to have sex with a woman, its hard to imagine u wont come when u will have intercourse with a woman. Heck, if u are a pedophile and say youre born like that, imagine a little kid while youre having sex with an adult woman, atleast youre not breaking the law right? but be careful in fantasizing as it may result in actions I bet serial killers start out "fantasizing" being gay and being atracted to other men isnt a fetish in any way, that truly is something youre "born" with, being a pedophile isnt why can't pedophilia be something you're born with? From what I'm getting from your post it you think that if they are having sex with an adult they can just imagine that they're having sex with a child. How is that different then gays that are in the closet and live like their straight (getting married, having kids, etc) that may do the same thing you're suggesting? Does that mean they are also not born the way they are, but that it gradually grows into a "deep urge" ?
[QUOTE="Ezgam3r"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]I don't believe that they don't at least once exploit a child in some way.....
LJS9502_basic
And why do you believe this LJS? Believing that a pedo can't go without exploiting a child is quite the general statement on your part. It's just like saying (off the top of my head) every computer programmer will make a virus and unleash it on the web. Sure, there are those who do, but not every one does it.Because I consider pictures as part of the deal....Even fictional art where no child gets harmed in any way?
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] I don't want to force you to accept it. I hate acting peadophiles probably more than anything in this world -- but I don't think you can condemn a person who has not commited a crime of any sort.LJS9502_basic
I don't believe that they don't at least once exploit a child in some way..... And why do you believe this LJS? Believing that a pedo can't go without exploiting a child is quite the general statement on your part. It's just like saying (off the top of my head) every computer programmer will make a virus and unleash it on the web. Sure, there are those who do, but not every one does it.
[QUOTE="Righteous_Rage"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Oh well.That's not my problem. Explotation of children is disgusting.sSubZerOo
Agreed. Exploitation is disgusting. Of anyone though, not just children. However, we're not talking about exploitation, we're talking about simple attraction. The average person be that gay or straight has looked at porn.. Or other such things.. What do you think the pedophile looks at? Homosexuals can act legally with consenting adults and the like.. Pedophiles can not, and yet again mankind as a spieces has a long history of the fact we can't control our urges alot of times.Pedophiles can look at lolicon and a good bit of anime and no one gets hurt besides the authors hand when a cramp comes about.
We were winning becasue we were killing more Vietnamese than they were killing Amereicans!AmayaPapaya
If killing more of them then they do of us equals victory, I guess Russia lost WWII and that King Pyrrhus totally came out ahead against the Romans... Oh wait...
Winning a war is:
complete destruction of the opposing territory
surrender of the opposing forces
taking the capital of opposing forces
capture the main leaders of opposing forces
The US didn't do any of these things so they didn't win.
Tactical success is completing your mission which was for the US preventing the North from taking the South. The US did not complete this goal. Vietnam was a tactical failure and the US defiantly didn't win it in any way as the North took the South shortly after the US forces left. They may not have lost militarily, but they did lose tactically.
I find that he's doing good, but could do better. But then again, he is only 151 days into a 1462 day job, so it may not be the best time to say he is a failure of a president or that he should "jump off a cliff".
I'm decent at the keyboard and a noob at the guitar. I have a small steelpan I got from my cousin when she came up to visit, but I only play around with it.
If by pedophilia you mean the attraction to children (3< y < 13 years old) by someone at or over 16 years old but doesn't act on their sexual urges, then yes they shouldn't be discriminated against.
If by pedophilia you mean the engagement of sexual acts with a child by someone 16 or over (Which your really referring to child sexual predators or abusers), then you haven't got a chance in hell unless mentality of society takes a joyride though candyland.
If religion didn't exist now, not a damn thing would change as people will continue to hate and take advantage of each other no matter what. Hate gays or minorities? Instead of using your take on your religious text, just go the good ol' Nazi way and say their genetically inferior and are the cause of all our problems... Oh wait... Crazy theologian dude on TV taking all the offerings to buy his 8th car to drive to his summer mansion? He'll just be a TV snake oil or Ponzi scheme salesman that goes around selling a whole load of crap making you think it's the best thing ever and you can't live without it.... Oh wait.... Nothing will really change besides religion not being the front for people's real intentions.
Log in to comment