The prequels are so god awful bad its best to not acknowledge their existence. Abrams can make some really cheesy movies but at least he can put a story together and pull out good performances from actors.

I for one am looking forward to a disgusting amount of lens flares. I expect the lens flares to stay consistently explicit and invasive to the story telling throughout the films entirety. Flares with such power they destroy immersion. They must shine so distract full, that all beautiful cinematography is left unappreciated. All other forms of media arts in star wars 7 will cower to the might of Lens Flares and bask in its glow like ungrateful worms. Any less and I will not be satisfied.

Well fallout is said to have over 400 hours of content. Theres no Level cap. And its supposedly the most ambitious game world bethesda has ever made to date. Syndicate looks fun no doubt, But Fallout 4 looks to be one of those special games you can enjoy for years to come. Syndicate seems more like a couple weekends worth of value.

Really its no contest, If you can only buy one game this fall, Fallout 4 is the way to go.

Really? You guys are complaining about a lack or a well written story?

Geez, some people will find any reason to bash a game.

It's a video game, NO video game has a good story, they are all poorly written and beyond cliche. If you want a story, read a book.

No FPS has a story anyway. Not your precious Half Life, not Halo, not Killzone, not anything.

Attempting to bash a game because of story it basically saying "I have nothing against this game but I want to bash it anyway"

ThePRAssassin

oh dear. you should really play some final fantasy.. or dragon age... or any other rpg for that matter. O hey what about call of duty 4? that has a pretty sweet story. You should give that one a try.

[QUOTE="Epicurus-Reborn"]

[QUOTE="h575309"] Maybe on Mars XBL costs 15$ a month, but not here.h575309

B/ regardless, its still not free. And still doesnt answer my question...

er... i do own both. lol thats why im asking. Im no fanboy either. It seems people have been saying xbox live is better but no one has given a reason as to why. I just got a ps3 recently and apparently there is no good reason to pay for xbox live when ps3 is free and just as good, therefore making it better. Thats would be like paying monthly to use firefox instead of just using Explorer for free as an internet browser. Thats ridiculous. Ill just conclude with that until some one has any noticeaple upper-hands xboxlive would have. CODMW2 for the PS3 it is!

[QUOTE="Epicurus-Reborn"]

[QUOTE="wayne_kar"]

they didnt mention any differances because their isnt any. if your not prepared to pay the £4 for live then i guess you should buy the PS3 version and suffer PSN

h575309

well 1st off its 15dollars a month. And second thats what i want to know. What does "suffer the PSN" mean??? whats worse about it? What would make my experience on live paying money all that much better? i wanted to know if there was any real reason xbox chrages monthly other than people keep paying for it.

B/ regardless, its still not free. And still doesnt answer my question...

[QUOTE="Epicurus-Reborn"]

So the review didnt say anything about differences between the ps3 and xbox versions. Not wanting to pay monthly for xbox live ill probably get the game for ps3. I was just wondering if there were any signifigent differences in the online experiences. Or even the game as a whole. (one being notably better than the other)

wayne_kar

they didnt mention any differances because their isnt any. if your not prepared to pay the £4 for live then i guess you should buy the PS3 version and suffer PSN

well 1st off its 15dollars a month. And second thats what i want to know. What does "suffer the PSN" mean??? whats worse about it? What would make my experience on live paying money all that much better? i wanted to know if there was any real reason xbox chrages monthly other than people keep paying for it.

So the review didnt say anything about differences between the ps3 and xbox versions. Not wanting to pay monthly for xbox live ill probably get the game for ps3. I was just wondering if there were any signifigent differences in the online experiences. Or even the game as a whole. (one being notably better than the other)

i was suggesting covering all blurst games in general but i supose this would be more useful, as this is the best deal on the site.

Title: Blurst Snack Pack
System: PC
Published by: FlashBang Studios
Developed by: FlashBang Studios
Genre: Puzzle/Action/Platforming/Awesome
Number of Players: 1
Release Date:
Release Region:
Support links please to prove you game exists
http://blurst.com/

I would love to see some coverage of Blurst.com Games. Or more accurately Flashbang studios games. They used to just be a free web based site (only) and the games were free so i could understand gamespot not covering them. But recently theyve started selling expanded versions in downloadable packages. I thought it would be great if gamespot finally did some coverage on those games. I hope this is right to place to bring this up... last time i tried mentioning blurst games on these forums i got a warning for advertising... Very Lame.