@Kunasha first you don't play Dark Souls on the PC it's extremly rushed and badly ported., second if Dark Souls graphic bothers you that much then I hate to tell you this, but you've got a problem, not being able to play a game because of how it looks if it looks incredibly bad (IE worse the FFVII) is a thing, but not being able to play a game because it looks like Dark Souls does, the problem is definitly on your end, we should want better gameplay/story/music over better graphics, graphics are nice, but that,s all they are, devs shouldn't sacrifice anything for graphics...
and lastly if you thought Dark Souls had bad music, you need to see a doctor about that hearing problem, because they are amazing, and that's a fact...
@divinejester except there's a pretty good story in both Demon Souls and Dark Souls (pretty sure Dark Souls II but I haven't gottent far enough yet), only thing is your not interrupted every 10 minutes by a 5 minutes cutscene, you have to look for the story, talk to NPC, read item descrpition, figure up the story with these hints and create links between everything. nothing is given to you on a silver platter in Souls game, same can be said for the story, most people would say there isn't a story but people that take the time to look for it will find that the story is in fact very much present, and is awesome at that...
if you don,t care to look for the story you can always watch ''EpicNameBro'' lore videos on Youtube, where he explains everything about the story.
@d-man @chre Souls game are exactly like old school games were, there was no giant flashing arrow saying ''level up dude over here'' but everyone still managed to find and and no one ever complained, only difference is now people are so accustomed to have their hands hold for the first 3/4 of the game, where the game just tells you exactly everything you can possibly ask about the game (to a point where guides are now useless because you,d have to be dump to not understand everything only by playing a game), that games that don't hold your hand like that seems like a mess and you have no clues where to go, if Souls game came out in the NES era, people wouldn,t complain at all.
people should try to play a game by themselves and explore a bit, a game is so much more fun if you find everything by yourself and manage to get a really good character all on your own w/o the game telling you exactly what you need to do every single time...
he really did it... he tried to pun the Last of Us fail...
Tom really just stop, please stop, there's a problem when according to GS Pupetter is better the The last of Us, it was a mistake by you and you should correct it instead of laughing about it, TLoU should have gotten a 9/9.5 out of 10 not 8.5...
Skyrim is not ''motivaing gameplay/commitement'' Skyrim Master basically forces you to play 1 particular way seeing as you mostly get one shotted by everythng, I call the whole Elder Scrolls Series on hard to be hard in the bad sense of the term (when the only thing that makes a game ''hard', is that ennemies one shots you and there is little room for maneuver in the gameplay) where in Dark Souls/demon Souls, you can play how you want, ennemies always do the same thing you just need to learn what they do and how to act accordingly. also any game that allows for save/reload can't be considered ''hard''
@rune114 nahh Kevin is fine, this review is kinda off but his reviews are usually good, Tom is the one to fire (8/10 to The Last of Us, 4/10 to Bioshock infinite, 9/10 to Beyond two souls (crappy game))
so according to Tom's code the DLC is crap? (he gives amazing games crappy scores (TLOU/Bioshock infinite) and crappy games, good scores (Beyond:two Souls)
@olddadgamer @WheelzFourReelz DLC isn't better. Especially since it's the same gameplay. Tom just saw that 8 didn't work at all so he raised his marks (TLOU got GOTY almost everywhere except Gamespot but strangely had ''8'')
Darkefka's comments