@boodleout: A lot of people are bitching about the WiiU ports and here you are asking for more. It has nothing to do with being fan boys, it's simply a matter of opinion. Also, E3 is for moving gaming forward and giving us awesome new stuff to look forward to. F the VC. No one else dropped a bomb like 2 Metroid games either.
A lot of you seem to think that "last Jedi" means there will only be one by the end of the movie, i.e. Rei. What it most likely means is that Luke is the last actual Jedi, and he'll be training Rei. You have to remember that Rei is just force sensitive, not a Jedi. Even Luke wasn't a Jedi "yet" until he completed his training, confronted Vader, etc. I think by the end of the movie, there will be two Jedi. Luke and Rei.
@westsiderz28: If you put Super Mario Bros.(the original) on a Switch, guess what? Graphics identical. If a game is designed to look a certain way with lower res assets, they won't magically be 4k, hyper-realistic, OMG it looks like reality itself! graphics. They'd have to redo the assets. What would improve is something like framerate, which has been stated to be superior on the Switch.
@wexorian: I actually read several of those reviews and they seem like people who just want to jump on the "movies based on games can't be good" bandwagon. The user reviews are 66%, so that seems more on par with reality.
This movie was excellent. The acting was great. The action scenes were great with some good chases. The assassins running on the roof tops and through buildings was really fun to watch. Many of the scenes made me feel like I was watching something right out of the games. The way they depicted the animus was actually much cooler than in the games. They definitely need to make a sequel to continue where they left off.
@dexda: You have no idea what it's like to play a video game console in the living room? That's what it is, you know.
I'd argue that Zelda is definitely the top end for adventure gaming, otherwise it wouldn't be so popular. Skyrim is just a bonus.
We don't know specs or actual 3rd party support, so you can't make a negative from something we don't know. Specs are meaningless anyway if games are boring or built on hype.
The articles argue that there's still some inflated value because of Pokémon Go, and they went down mostly because we don't know a lot of details yet. That doesn't mean anything. If it goes down again when we get the details in January, that would be more meaningful with the caveat that the article pointed out: investors generally don't know anything about gaming. That's the difference they were pointing out when comparing investor opinions to millions of gamers online and their response to the trailer. It's a reasonable point to make. Acknowledging facts isn't denial of anything.
If you can't care less, then why are you here? It suggests you care enough to check it out, which means you can care less.
CrillanK's comments