PS3 looks better in most games. Better lighting, contrast and filtering. Although some games don't apply to this. They're pretty matched. I generally think games programmed for the PS3, and not ported, look better than the 360. Textures look largely similar, although 360 seems to have a very slight edge in 2 or so of the games. However, I think the edges are generally smoother on the PS3, very sharp and crispy on the 360 - pixellated. I think that's why the textures possibly look better. Most of the games seem to lack or only have 2x AA, so I'm not sure what that's about. @ rugripper40, the 360 has better exclusives? They're both pretty matched. PS3: MGS, GoW, Killzone etc. 360: has games like Fable etc.

this article seems pretty pointless...

i think more than half the time that gs is refering to the "blur" of the ps3, i think its just motion blurring or distance blurring (focus). in game when everything is animate it does make a difference, looks more real and nicer, i've always found the 360 a bit scratchy or pixellated in the background and distance, might be something to do with better anti-aliasing or something, not too sure. i think gs are trying to make too much of a thing with it, trying to pick at anything they kind find.

[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

hmm, as far as i can tell, the only real difference is that on vista, the greys seem to be more black instead...>_

maybe the makers of the game only allowed a high quality setting in XP instead of the very high quality setting because they don't want people to know that there is extremely little difference in direct x9 and directx10...or perhaps they were told to not allow the very high setting in xp