There's really no noticeable difference between high and very high quality settings for anything except shadows, which high quality looks prettier anyways. There appears to be a coloring effect used in very high quality, but other than those two there's no difference at all, and that's pretty much nothing. There's a big fps booster right there.

I can honestly say I see extremely little difference between DirectX 9 and 10.

One of the main reasons I didn't enjoy Halo 2 as much is because the crosshairs weren't in the middle of the screen. Looks like that's back in Halo 3. Dang.

Yay, more shooters set in world war II and the war on terror. As if there weren't a thousand of them already. We're getting a little repetitive here guys, we need some originality fast.

The End can die of old age? That's hilarious!! I'm also loving the Real Ultimate Power reference in the Gray Fox's description.

The new E3 got more information out there faster. Maybe this year's E3 wasn't the best, but you can't expect the best E3 ever every year. You'll only be disappointed.

How many Pokemon are there now anyway?

Look at STALKER. Pitiful. The graphics aren't even that good and the best of the best graphics cards can't run it well. Terrible game engine.

Chainsawers and trashtalkers in Gears of War on XBL.

Hitman Blood Money is kinda american