Well I have a decent brand new gaming laptop, no it probably couldn't run Crysis like it should be played but I'm sure I won't have a problem with this game. Glad they decided to make this game open for a wider audience by lowering the requirments.
I am a console gamer through and through...as are most PC gamers. The PC has better resolution, but this is hardly enough to convince any gamepad jockies to hop platforms and the same goes for the advantages of the console. Bottom line is this article likely isn't going to change any minds, quite interesting to see the game on the opposite platform though. Either way BioShock is in good running for Game of the Year...at least in my opinion.
God I hate stupid developers that feel they need to use the screen in every DS game. It is a bonus some games should use, however games like Brothers in Arms is worse off for using it.
Best to worst in order: 1. III, cool story-line and awesome game. Literally reinvented a genre and created a new one at the same time. 2. SanAndreas actually took steps on improving the games engine, although not the graphics. Huge enviroment. HOT COFFEE! 3. Vice City great game but seemed more like a mod of III than a new game. Set new levels on what is expected for game soundtracks. Well...I guess they were all really good, Vice City was just the least impressive.
Why does everybody think Halo is better than Halo 2, other than the campaign which you can pretty much play once. There is no online for Halo, no bots for Halo and maps that are only fun with more than four people. The game is garbage unless you have eight or more friends who are willing to bring their systems over to your house just to play multiplayer. Obviously the game didn't have online, it was a bit before it's time, but it still could have had bots, true not as good as real people but none the less it would have made it more enjoyable. It should be considered broken for any fps released post N64 to not have either bots or an online function.
BoogieManZero's comments