"We do hold our officers to very high standards, and we have a zero tolerance policy for theft in the workplace,"

I would like to think they have a zero tolerance policy on theft in general, regardless where it happened.

[QUOTE="Austindro"]

[QUOTE="Frostbite24"] Sorry that it bothers you, I don't write the rules bud I just interpret them. -50 points for impersonating and slandering an official adjudicator.Frostbite24

Interpreting rules and taking/giving points away are two different things.

Edit: lol and what rules?

8 points? Gtfo with that, you already took 50. How are you going to steal someone's car and give them back their air freshener?

[QUOTE="Austindro"]

[QUOTE="Frostbite24"] I was just noting that you often come off fanboyish in your posting and seem to be riled up easily by trolls such as forza. -5 points for defiance and downplaying the importance of point attribution.Frostbite24

Srsly? -20 points for pretentious relegating on a chimerical point system.

Interpreting rules and taking/giving points away are two different things.

Edit: lol and what rules?

[QUOTE="_Cadbury_"][QUOTE="Frostbite24"] Forza can't make threads anymore. -5 points for missed observation, +3 for defensive cuteness.Frostbite24

Srsly? -20 points for pretentious relegating on a chimerical point system.

Love grits, just not if it is served in jail.

After years of waiting, the Xbox 360 fu**ing finally outsells the PS3 worldwide. :lol::P

About time Lemmings.

tonitorsi

DC is strong in this one.

Late to the party.

[QUOTE="Austindro"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"] Both are examples of restrictions on free speech. In both instances, you CAN say those things but have to deal with consequences. I'm not seeing how the US offers unchecked free speech here, like someone suggested earlier.SolidSnake35

There are only consequences when it involves assault.

Edit: Or treason but that should go without saying.

I never said there were not restrictions.

Good forhim, GS moves on.