How are you fellow gamers?
So, I haven't posted any blog entries for about 2 years, but I'm back.
So what about some gamespot reviews the new and the old ones. Why would a game like CoD Black Ops get a 9/10 and a game like Crysis 3 gets a 7.5/10 ?? Well, Crysis 3 is a far better game in every aspect, better graphics, better weapons, better gameplay experience overall, and it has the nanosuit so you can mix things up, whilst all CoD games are generic shooters, just aim and shoot, sure it's fun if you play a CoD game for the first time, but what if you have played other CoD games, isn't it the same as the previous one, with nothing more than a new setting and some new weapons?? it feels like a DLC more than a new game. Crysis games have innovated something new in the FPS genre, and it plays amazingly, sure Crysis 3 looks a lot like Crysis 2 but those games never get boring and they intruduced some fresh ideas into Crysis 3.
In my opinion, the 9 should be given to Cryisis 3 and the 7.5 to CoD Black Ops.
And what about some games like Surgeon Simulator 2013, it got an 8/10 because it was just humurous as gamespot review says, it sure can be fun for like an hour and then what?? Gamespot just put this game in the same leaugue as the Last of Us, giving both games an 8/10. This is just ridiculous. I haven't played the Last of Us because I don't have a PS3, but judging from what people are saying and other sites reviews, the game seems like a masterpiece. So why would they give the same score to a game that'll give one hour of fun and to an experience that might stick with you for years to come.
And speaking of humurous, why wouldn't they give that 8/10 to the Deadpool game, because it's funny as hell, I haven't laughed so hard playing another video game, and the combat is very entertaining and it will last for more than seven hours Vs that one hour of gameplay playing Surgeon Simulator 2013.
I don't think that a very popular and great site like Gamespot should make such mistakes.
What do you think?