[QUOTE="eatspie"] So im 15 years old because I hategames with bad graphics and bad gameplay yet youre an adult because you give a game a score it dosent deserve wow you make perfect sense (thats sarcasim). Oh and as far as im concerned yes you are a fanboy, badly need an rpg, or aare in extreme denial if you give a game like two worlds amything higher than a 7.5
smerlus
I'd say your 15 years old because of your namecalling of anyone whose opinion differs from yours and the fact that you can't articulate why you don't like this game.
The gameplay is bad? The combat is less shallow than Oblivion's yet you recommend Oblivion. In Oblivion you could march through the game at level 5, sneaking sucked, Bows were useless, there was far less weapons and armor, characters became jacks of all trades no matter what class you picked and everyone had the same experience in the game because no matter how you played the game... you could do the same quests as anyone else.
in Two World's you get your ass kicked at level 5, sneaking isn't too bad but still pretty broken, Bows are actually an option, there are tons of different weapons and armor to choose from, combat is a little more interesting thanks to combat orientated feats, you chraracter can be whatever you feel like... a jack of all trades or very proficient in a few things and the experience of a play through actually changes because some quests make other quests null encouraging further play throughs.
oh and graphics are horrid? Were any of the GTA graphics horrid because of the amount of things they have going on? in Two Worlds you have a farther viewing distance than Oblivion and a much more lively world. In Oblivion you could walk for 10 minutes and not see a single living thing, in two worlds you have a whole bunch of mundane animals, bandits, wolves, bears, monsters and creatures roaming all over the place and also the cities are seamlessly built into the world unlike Oblivion's. It's a shame that there are frequent loading times that cause the game to hiccup quite often... but other than that the game looks great for all the things it pulls off at once.
so i look forward to hearing your argument but pretty much all you can do so far is say "well this sucks, you're a fanboy" so i'm not expecting much.
But your doing the same thing as Oblivion. Im going to play two worlds again and get at least 10 hours, because from what ive heard, it deserves at least that. But personally, I thought Oblivion was a great game. Yes, you can march through the game at level 5, become good at every skill, and do the same quests as everyone else. But that opens it up to so much more people... even people who don't play video games (many people ive known loved it and have never enjoyed a video game other then pacman). This can be a letdown to a huge rpg fan, though its good that it was open to so many people imo. Personally, I think they should have had an option to make enemies level with you.... oh well.
On sneaking and bows, I actually came to enjoy them later... sneaking was no splinter cell, but it was okay, and the bows actually helped me out a lot when I made someone with marksman as a primary skill. But thats just my opinion.
My opinion on two worlds is not very valid, because I have only played 3:30. But from that time, I didn't find the draw distance to be better then oblivion... maybe I wasnt paying attention? I don't know, but ill just have to see.
Anyway, thats just my opinion on oblivion... im going to have to play two worlds a bit more... from my experience already, I think oblivion is a better game. Just because its not extremely hard isnt enough of a reason for me not to like it. But like ive already said, my opinion on two worlds is probaly less then valid.
Log in to comment