I hear people talk about replay value a lot, but it's something that doesn't really mean much to me since I usually never play a game more than once. To me the replay value in a game lies solely in multiplayer.
What about you?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I tend to replay games more than once. And i dont mean Multiplayer... If a game is good enough for me, stayed in my mind after i finished it, i go ahead and replay it again, and again, and again...
FPSs like Metro 2033, Bioshock and Singularity are story-driven but very memorable for different reasons. Sometimes you just want to dip deeper into a gaming world (ala Rapture) over and over again.
RPGs for example tend to have a high replay value. Games like Oblivion, Fallout 3 and New Vegas, i tend to re-play twice a year (if not more)...
Very rarely, I put so much time and effort into the game first time round that I struggle to play a second time. One of the biggest cases of this is KOTOR (I know PC game, but using as an example) were I literaly explored every nook and crany, spent ages with the story.
Didn't attempt to replay for a year or so, but when I did I knew pretty much everything and barely got through the first planet.
Although I play mainly RPGs so maybe this is why?
Very rarely, I put so much time and effort into the game first time round that I struggle to play a second time. One of the biggest cases of this is KOTOR (I know PC game, but using as an example) were I literaly explored every nook and crany, spent ages with the story.
Didn't attempt to replay for a year or so, but when I did I knew pretty much everything and barely got through the first planet.
Although I play mainly RPGs so maybe this is why?
eyko
Yeah i played through both KOTORs on the xbox plenty of times. Same with the Mass Effects. But i would agree now that mainly multiplayer is the replay value for most games. Also i played Farenheit a few times. If nobody knows what that is its basically Heavy Rain but on the original Xbox.
No, thankfully 90% of games that i indulge in have a good replay value, Bioshock 1 & 2, Red Dead Redemption, Red Faction Guerilla,Dead Space, Fallout 3/New Vegas & Gears of War 2 have all deserved a re-visit.
For me it really depends. Games like Oblivion, Dragon Age, and Mass Effect are fun to revisit and play again. Games that aren't as diverse as those titles don't hold the same appeal to me. Those games I'll keep in my collection until I've gotten all of the cheevos for them, but after that it's back to gamestop for those titles.
i totally agree with thisI hear people talk about replay value a lot, but it's something that doesn't really mean much to me since I usually never play a game more than once. To me the replay value in a game lies solely in multiplayer.
What about you?
Xeros606
Like others mentioned, I play once on the hardest difficulty to try and get all the achievements I can in one run. Usually if I bought the game mostly for multiplayer (such as Halo: Reach, or Gears of War 2), I'd only play campaign once. Campaigns like these are very linear, so there is not much value in playing them over again. But with games sorely devoted to open areas and exploration (such as Fallout 3, and Bioshock) I would play it through at least twice. Eventually when I get think I've done all I can, I'll probably trade it in or eBay it it I can get a good deal.
I'm currently playing GoldenEye on a harder difficulty after completing it the first time in the beginner mode (or whatever it was called).
Why do people do this? It's saddening. Then again, I'm picky with my games, so I generally don't have any problem playing the heck out of the games I already have before buying new ones.Ipretty much play them once. As an adult with more games I'd like to play than I'll ever have time to play as it is, I sure don't have time to play them more than once.
jekyll
[QUOTE="jekyll"]Why do people do this? It's saddening. Then again, I'm picky with my games, so I generally don't have any problem playing the heck out of the games I already have before buying new ones.Ipretty much play them once. As an adult with more games I'd like to play than I'll ever have time to play as it is, I sure don't have time to play them more than once.
pills4louis
Well, some of us have jobs, families, social lifes and most importantly bills and responsibilities which are vital for one's survival. Time is of the essence, so less time is available for hobbies like games and such. Once you grow up a little more and real life hits you hard you will come up with the same answer as the one you are now questioning.;)
It depends on what game. If the game is really good and I need to get some extra achievements such as playing on a harder difficulty I will. Also, if it is a really good RPG I will play it over to see what if I did a different path.
I do a little bit of both.
There are a lot of games that I play through once and then I am done with it. I sell it and forget about it.
But there are many games that I constantly go back to. These are the games I keep in my collection. I've played through my games for my older consoles more times than I can count. And there are a couple games in this generation that I go back to often, like Dragon Age Origins, Puzzle Quest, and Tales of Vesperia. Sure there are plenty of other games I could be playing, but I would rather spend my time playing games I know I love than playing through a string of games that may be mediocre.
Usually, I'll play through a game more than once. The first time to just beat it and enjoy the story. Second time to get achievements I missed and what not.
Why do people do this? It's saddening. Then again, I'm picky with my games, so I generally don't have any problem playing the heck out of the games I already have before buying new ones.[QUOTE="pills4louis"][QUOTE="jekyll"]
Ipretty much play them once. As an adult with more games I'd like to play than I'll ever have time to play as it is, I sure don't have time to play them more than once.
EvilSelf
Well, some of us have jobs, families, social lifes and most importantly bills and responsibilities which are vital for one's survival. Time is of the essence, so less time is available for hobbies like games and such. Once you grow up a little more and real life hits you hard you will come up with the same answer as the one you are now questioning.;)
That statement would hold validity if I wasn't 27 and working to pay for my apartment/ cable/ etc. Technically, if you're out on your own, buying games frequently works against your self-preservation. Would be better to get the most out of your existing collection and have a tad bit of discretion instead of making impulse purchases every month. Then again, my tastes dictate that what I buy generally always has replay value, most of the time in single-player, though I do play a few multiplayer games online. I usually stay wary of playing (or at least actually paying for) flavor-of-the-month games, i.e. games with a deadline. A game should be designed so that it can be enjoyed for years to come. Hence why I didn't think MGS4, Heavy Rain, Alan Wake, or almost all Final Fantasies (and most JRPGs, at that) were really that great at all. Too much of a movie, not enough of a game.I could probably count the number of games I've replayed on one hand.And even of these, it usually took years before I replayed them.
I try and get the most out of the game the first time around,which makes replaying pretty much pointless. And even if I dont do most everything in a game, I still cant replay it becausethe majority of the game is *still* very 'been there, done that'. Like all these games that give you'choices', such as Mass Effect and Oblivion and everything -these choices dont really change the experience that much. You're still doing the samequests for the most part and the consequences are typically insignificant in the big picture.
It really depends if the game has any replay value such as collectibles, different paths, achievements, online co op, etc.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment